Nintex RPA vs UiPath Studio comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Nintex and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Nintex is ranked #14, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Nintex holds a 2.4% mindshare in RPA, compared to UiPath’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nintex RPA and UiPath Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 5.2%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Studio is 0.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere	5.2%
UiPath Studio	0.7%
Nintex RPA	2.4%
Other	91.7%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

VijayBhallamudi

Senior Business Analyst at Flix

Citizen developers have automated finance processes and created reusable modules across entities

There are some weaknesses, though nothing on the top of my mind at the moment. From a process and OCR point of view, for example, we are currently doing a use case about e-invoicing. We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated. We had to not go with that module that UiPath Studio offers. UiPath Studio has an a la carte mode where you can buy specific functionalities without having to buy the whole package. We decided to test out a few other tools in the market and bought a customized tool specifically for OCR purposes because UiPath Studio's accuracy was not as great. It comes more on a use case-to-use case basis. Certain use cases that we try show that certain functionalities could be improved, and there is definitely a scope for improvement. That being said, the functionalities that we bought UiPath Studio initially for work pretty well. We wanted a centralized automation hub, an Orchestrator, and maximum license utilization for the bots we were purchasing. They are basic, but at the same time, they are easy to use. The ease of use is one of the main reasons why we still favor UiPath Studio. The AI and OCR parts are something we are looking to explore more in the coming year, and that will probably give us more insights into the functionalities and their value. At the moment, we use Oracle as our ERP. We have not had much success integrating with Oracle so far. UiPath Studio offers a lot of customized integrations for SAP, but not much for Oracle Cloud. We had to leverage our internal ERP in-house team to build integrations. We used Oracle Cloud integrations rather than UiPath Studio integrations with respect to ERP. Every conference or event that UiPath Studio organizes, when we have a chance to speak with someone from UiPath Studio, we bring up Oracle Cloud integrations. I believe that in Europe and the US, Oracle Cloud is growing in usage, so we would appreciate more effort focused there. However, with Salesforce, we used a couple of cases with customer service in our company, and we integrated with it very smoothly without any blockers. At the moment, we have not explored AI and ML capabilities of UiPath Studio as much as we should have. We conducted a series of process discovery workshops in our company, and the use cases we received did not require AI or ML functionalities because they were core finance operations, and we did well with just the regular functionalities of UiPath Studio. We are still looking forward to finding a case where we could leverage AI and ML capabilities. We do not want to use AI functionalities just because we want to use them. It is more of a situation where we ask if it is needed, and we are still looking forward to finding a case that demands the need for AI functionalities or a nice-to-have feature. At the moment, we still have not used or explored those things of UiPath Studio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Automation Anywhere is the unattended mode bots, because we don't need to go and look at what they're doing. They just go by themselves."

"The RPA automation itself is valuable."

"I would recommend using this product; it is very useful, we can automate anything through it, there is much flexibility, and it provides a robust mechanism, which is good."

"We have a bot running on a computer that is doing manual tasks that we used to do."

"In some cases, we see savings on the order of $100,000 and, in the newer processes that we are trying to do, it may be up to $1,000,000."

"Document automation has indeed been beneficial in handling large volumes of documents in our organization, where we process product-related data sheets that range from 80 to 120 pages, efficiently extracting data that would take a human several hours to read manually."

"AA helped our clients to achieve their goals faster and more efficiently, also reaching ROI very quickly."

"Non-developers can use the tool to create bots. Also, it is very easy for developers to use."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"The most valuable features for our organization are the automatic processes which save main power in the back office."

"The user-friendly environment allows for easy learning, and the end-to-end workflow management is excellent."

"Since then, we've been able to close numerous claims and therefore reduce our reserves by literally millions of dollars."

"Cuts time due to the building of a robot which runs during the night to perform time-consuming and tedious activities."

"Troubleshooting and debugging could be improved. It's missing a proper debugger. It's very difficult, based on the log files and the fact that it doesn't have a proper debugger, to troubleshoot issues. It will sometimes end with no indication as to why it ended and it becomes a bit of trial and error."

"In the testing area there is a good ROI, because we're now capable of doing things that we couldn't before, completely, and it's a game-changer."

"Once I decide a process is suitable as a Kryon solution, the cycle of automation is quite quick. I learn about the manual process and I'm one of the two guys who program the Kryon environment. It's relatively simple. There are many details, but once you understand the concept it is quite easy."

"As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win."

More Nintex RPA pros

"UiPath Studio is good for automating business processes and repetitive tasks within my company."

"Right now we have it deployed, and it is dealing with about 50% of our document volume."

"I have seen a return on investment because we have saved around one million dollars on a yearly basis with our 1,000 bots."

"Compared to other tools, UiPath Studio licensing cost is low."

"There are a lot of great things in UiPath Studio; whatever is required for the development is there, and I do not think I face any difficulty during the development of any use case from UiPath Studio's side."

"The fact that with UiPath Studio we can build reusable modules that we can use across automations has been specifically very useful to us as a company and team driving this project."

Cons

"The main problem that I have with Automation Anywhere is the support. When I have problems that I cannot solve by myself, it is hard to achieve a good result with support. Language is another issue."

"We have a lot of use cases that depend on certain Java applets, and currently we're not able to leverage the Object Cloning that would speed up our automation designing. So we have to revert to more image recognition-type of designing, and it just takes a long time to get that bot built."

"We would like to have a better debugging facility."

"I think Automation Anywhere could be improved by addressing the learning curve, as it is a little complex to start using it, especially for people new to automation tools."

"We have had some difficulty with ease of use. In addition, we have had some difficulties getting it to interact in predictable ways with our in-house software."

"The UI can be improved a little bit to make it easier for beginners to understand."

"We would like to see the scalability improve from a local perspective."

"Cost-wise, it should be reduced."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."

"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."

"From our experience, the product is not suitable for end users."

"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging. That would be helpful."

"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool."

"We use Google Drive a lot. If somebody sends us a spreadsheet or a document, it's going to be in Google’s format. It's not going to be in Microsoft Office format. But currently, there's no integration with Google’s documents. That would be a huge plus to have."

"At first, we had problems with the object detection but in this latest release it has been better, and I think it keeps getting better."

"Kryon RPA's integration with other solutions could be more seamless."

More Nintex RPA cons

"Some of the recent upgraded versions, the package sometimes create problems, so that has to be tested first and then it should be available in UiPath Studio, because everybody wants to use the latest package, but sometimes when we are using the latest package, it creates problems."

"On the improving side, concerning costing, I am not sure because the cost of the new product is very high."

"We are not seeing improved ROI because the bigger chunks of use cases we have already addressed. When we take it down to the medium size, the cost of development and deployment is something which is prohibitive and it doesn't make a good financial business case."

"In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not that reliable."

"We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are restricted to use one license on one PC. However, if my license is not working, I want to be able to use it somewhere else. This would be a nice improvement to the licensing, as other competitors in the market have better licensing terms."

"We brought onshore a lot of what we were doing offshore, saving our company close to $20 million."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"In terms of pricing, it's not at all cheap, and that's a concern. The licensing cost is very high. While I don't know the exact prices of other tools, Microsoft offers the lowest pricing for its RPA platform compared to UiPath and Automation Anywhere."

"Price is where I'm least satisfied. Other vendors are more willing to offer discounts."

"The licensing cost is approximately $4,000 USD, which is a seed license."

"Automation Anywhere might have a higher upfront cost than some competitors, but its extensive features and seamless integration with other tools can save organizations money in the long run."

"IQ Bots are very costly. It's not a sustainable bot for us as of now. We will look for better, alternate options for that."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

"Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment."

"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

29%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	161
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	561

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 525...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Studio?

I am satisfied with the current price for the product and overall licensing costs. Whatever price is given is provide...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Studio?

In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Studio?

My usual use cases for UiPath Studio are in banking and BFSI use cases. Currently, we have around 1,000 plus bots in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Nintex RPA

Compared 4% of the time

Jacada Intelligent Agent Engagement vs Nintex RPA

Compared 4% of the time

NTT-AT WinActor vs Nintex RPA

Compared 4% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Dify vs UiPath Studio

Compared 17% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs UiPath Studio

Compared 9% of the time

Appian RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Laiye UiBot vs UiPath Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

October 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Studio

September 2026

Download UiPath Studio product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Kryon RPA

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Nintex

Demo not available

UiPath

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Nintex RPA enhances automation efforts with user-friendly features, supporting both technical and non-technical teams by simplifying tasks and improving efficiency. Its capabilities extend across various platforms, providing a scalable and secure environment for effective task management.

Focusing on automation, Nintex RPA offers solutions for integrating Excel, emails, and databases to reduce manual effort significantly. Known for its intuitive design and advanced security, it facilitates customization and deployment across platforms. Users note the ease of recording actions, while scalability meets the needs of diverse industries including banking and finance. However, some enhancements like object recognition improvements and better OCR for unstructured data could refine its usability. Challenges in integration with platforms like Google Docs and ServiceNow, coupled with desires for better training support and AI capabilities, highlight areas for potential growth.

What are the key features of Nintex RPA?

Recording User Actions: Simplifies task automation via direct recording.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Offers an intuitive way to design workflows.
Cross-Platform Integration: Facilitates seamless connectivity across systems.
Scalable Automation: Grows with business demands without complexity.
Advanced Security: Ensures protection of sensitive data during automation.
Task Mining: Identifies and enhances process efficiency.

What benefits can users expect in terms of ROI?

Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks to save time.
Enhanced Efficiency: Improves productivity by streamlining processes.
Cost-Effective: Provides an economical solution with competitive pricing.
Reliability: Offers consistent and accurate task execution.
Customization Ease: Simple modifications cater to changing business needs.

In industries like banking, insurance, and finance, Nintex RPA is employed to streamline operations such as SAP and Excel processes, customer account management, and data extraction. Its capabilities in routine automation, including anti-money laundering procedures and onboarding, enable businesses to reduce manual intervention while supporting both attended and unattended workflows.

Nintex

UiPath Studio is a comprehensive tool for automating repetitive tasks. It's designed to enhance efficiency and productivity by providing a robust environment for building automation workflows quickly.

UiPath Studio offers a rich set of features catering to users looking to streamline operations through automation. Intuitive drag-and-drop functionality and seamless integration capabilities make it ideal for automating both simple and complex processes across diverse environments. Its detailed debugging tools and support for attended and unattended automation enable users to tailor their automation solutions to fit specific needs. By focusing on improving operational efficiency, UiPath Studio helps organizations to innovate while reducing manual efforts. It stands out for its adaptability and ease of implementation, fostering faster, more efficient process automation across industries.

What are the key features of UiPath Studio?

Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies the automation design process, making it more accessible.
Comprehensive Activity Library: Offers pre-built activities for common processes, enhancing workflow creation.
Advanced Debugging Tools: Facilitates error identification and resolution to ensure reliable automation.
Attended and Unattended Modes: Allows flexibility in automation execution, catering to different organizational needs.
Integration with Third-Party Applications: Enhances workflow capabilities by connecting with external systems.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating UiPath Studio?

Increased Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks to free up valuable employee time.
Cost Savings: Reduces labor costs by leveraging automation to handle routine tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands and more complex workflows with ease.
Improved Accuracy: Minimizes errors that can occur in manual processes.
Faster Deployment: Quickly implements with minimal disruption, accelerating time-to-value.

UiPath Studio is implemented across multiple industries, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, to automate data entry, billing operations, and compliance checks. In finance, it streamlines transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it manages patient data and administrative tasks. Manufacturing firms apply it to handle inventory and quality control processes, ensuring consistency and precision.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

September 2026

Free Report: Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.