OpenText Functional Testing vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

19,772 Views
14,631 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing and Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] are competing in the software testing category. OpenText Functional Testing takes the lead in features and support, while QA Wizard Pro is advantageous in ease of deployment.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides robust automation tools, extensive protocol support, and diverse application integration. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] effectively handles functional and load testing but lacks broader integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing ensures an easy deployment with dedicated customer support, facilitating smooth implementation. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers quick, simple installation but limited support options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has a higher setup cost but delivers substantial ROI with advanced features and support. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] appeals with lower initial costs, suitable for short-term budgets, though OpenText justifies its price through long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Whereas, in UFT One, I like that our maintenance costs have been reduced by a lot because UFT One is using an artificial intelligence feature to identify objects visually."

"UFT is easy to use for functional testing, so for me it’s very important that it can travel across a large range of technologies."

"The UFT tool can be such a huge boon to a testing organization that can commit to its use."

"The fact that it works with a vast number of technologies works for us because our internal customers use the tool for testing a lot of different applications."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this product is that it integrates well into your environment, is easy to use, easy to maintain, and makes your development efforts more efficient."

"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."

"UFT One is 100 percent stable."

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"Cost is one area where there is room for improvement."

"Micro Focus UFT One could improve by having more maintenance. Every time when we run the solution and develop something, the next time when we run it it doesn't recognize the object. I have to redesign the object again and then run the solution. It's really a headache, it's not consistent."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation)."

"I would like to see them remove the shortcoming of working with .NET applications, as there is not much support provided for automating applications developed on .NET."

"The scripting language could be improved. They're currently using Visual Basic, but I think that people need something more advanced, like Python or Java."

"Stability can be an issue, and the weaker the resources on the machine running UFT the more likely there will be problems."

"Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"Generally, we can say that we have not had an excellent experience with Perforce."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	74

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that pro...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

October 2026

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2026

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing is designed for ease of use, featuring strong object identification, AI capabilities, and multi-platform integration. Its VBScript simplicity and cross-browser, mobile support make it versatile for handling UI and API tests.

OpenText Functional Testing provides a seamless testing experience with powerful automation capabilities. Its integration with technologies like SAP and Oracle, combined with record and playback features, makes it a go-to tool for comprehensive testing environments. Users find value in its flexibility to streamline both UI and API tests. Challenges include high costs and resource usage, and there's a demand for broader programming language support and improved integration with CI/CD pipelines. Enhanced AI functionalities and better documentation are also requested.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Ease of Use: Simple scripting enhances the experience for testers.
Object Identification: Strong abilities ensure accurate testing.
AI Capabilities: Advanced AI features support testing automation.
Platform Integration: Compatible with SAP, Oracle and more.
Cross-Browser Testing and Mobile Support: Versatile testing across devices and browsers.

What benefits can users find in the reviews?

Automation Efficiency: Streamlines test executions saving time.
Versatility Across Technologies: Supports multiple platforms enhancing flexibility.
Scalability: Handles a wide range of testing requirements.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances the accuracy and reliability of tests.

OpenText Functional Testing is utilized in industries requiring robust testing frameworks like finance and healthcare. Companies automate web, desktop, and API applications, perform functional tests, and handle validations. Its adaptability to integration and broad technology support facilitates diverse testing needs.

OpenText

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.