No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Picus Security vs XM Cyber comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Picus Security
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (6th)
XM Cyber
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Controls Monitoring (4th), Vulnerability Management (43rd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (30th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Picus Security and XM Cyber aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Picus Security is designed for Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and holds a mindshare of 8.3%, down 17.1% compared to last year.
XM Cyber, on the other hand, focuses on Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), holds 9.6% mindshare, down 15.3% since last year.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Picus Security8.3%
Pentera17.8%
Cymulate14.9%
Other59.0%
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
XM Cyber9.6%
Pentera8.9%
Wiz8.8%
Other72.7%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

KA
Information Security System Manager at CS-Consulting
A tool with great integration capabilities and a good support team
Picus Security has been implemented in our organization to enhance threat detection by allowing us to test some of the other security tools in our company. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. The tool has not had an impact on our company's overall security posture since the time of implementation since we just used it for some testing purposes, during which it did show some interesting results. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
Amelia Torres Medrano - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Security Officer at Prezero
Has improved risk visibility and highlights the need for faster support response
The roadmap is a disadvantage because this kind of technology should incorporate AI. At the moment, we don't have any modules with AI. They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks. This aspect needs improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."
"The list of vulnerabilities that get detected is the most valuable feature."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"Picus Security has improved and is still improving the security level of my organization."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"Six weeks into using XM Cyber, we saw a compelling return on investment—primarily in risk reduction, with a specific issue our other security tooling did not pick up but XM Cyber did, reducing IT remediation time and saving over 60,000 US dollars per year while significantly lowering our loss exposure amount."
"XM Cyber made it clear that browser vulnerabilities were the top priority because the platform was able to examine how vulnerabilities within our estate could be exploited and what the path would be from some bad actor in order to exploit those vulnerabilities."
"Since implementing XM Cyber, we have improved the way we are doing patching, focusing on the choke points in our patching cycle, and it improves the way we assess the risk."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"It saves you money while making you more secure."
"XM Cyber permits us to identify if a zero-day vulnerability can affect our infrastructure; it helps me understand the company's total risk that we have in our infrastructure and workstation vulnerability, and it permits us to identify the real impact when we have a vulnerability."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
 

Cons

"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."
"There are a lot of other products which are performing better; as far as Picus is concerned, we have been aggressively trying to reach out to customers to try to sell it, but have not been successful."
"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."
"We have not saved any time or effort, but we can prove that the effort involved around vulnerability management has been better spent to greater effect, and we've been able to demonstrate that vulnerabilities that do represent a high risk have been remediated more rapidly and more effectively."
"There are many interesting things about XM Cyber, but the part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment."
"They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
"We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."
"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."
"We have to pay standard licensing fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?
The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.
What needs improvement with Picus Security?
There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.
What is your primary use case for Picus Security?
I can simulate an attack into a live environment and test whether my controls are working properly. It checks if the controls can stop and mitigate the attacks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for XM Cyber?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that we have a large, complicated estate, and in the licensing discussions, we were keen not to have the cost balloon because of the compli...
What needs improvement with XM Cyber?
The roadmap is a disadvantage because this kind of technology should incorporate AI. At the moment, we don't have any modules with AI. They could improve support because when we need to create a su...
What is your primary use case for XM Cyber?
My major use case for XM Cyber is managing the services in our company, Prosegur Iberia, for Spain and Portugal. We develop and work together with XM Cyber technicians to develop use cases and anal...
 

Comparisons

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ING Bank, Turkcell, Vodafone, City National Bank, Saudi Investment Bank, Sutter Health, GSK, VMware, Turkish Airlines, Vistra, Kraft Heinz, Packaging Corporation of America, Mastercard, Crocs
Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Horizon3.ai, Pentera, Cymulate and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.