No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 96% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 71 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 8,397 Views
  • 504 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Runscope EOL and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring space. Postman Enterprise holds an advantage, offering a more robust solution due to its enhanced features.

    Features: Postman Enterprise offers automated testing workflows, API documentation, and advanced collaboration features. Runscope EOL provided comprehensive API monitoring, internal team collaboration, and was simpler for smaller teams.

    Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could improve by simplifying its interface and reducing the learning curve. Runscope EOL needed stronger customer support, scalability, and a broader range of advanced features.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise is straightforward to deploy and offers reliable customer support for large-scale operations. Runscope EOL was easier to deploy for small teams but lacked extensive support for larger enterprises.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope EOL was more budget-friendly for startups, whereas Postman Enterprise, despite a higher cost, provides better ROI due to its comprehensive features and scalability.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.9
    Number of Reviews
    71
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (5th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (7th)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    RituRaj - PeerSpot reviewer
    RituRaj
    SDE 2 at Virtusa
    Centralized collaboration has transformed API testing and documentation across multiple teams
    In terms of improvement, the UI can sometimes feel heavy for larger collections in the workspaces. Additionally, performance may slow down with complex API projects, and pricing can be expensive for smaller teams. However, it is quite suitable for bigger teams. Other areas for improvement include better reporting and analytics dashboards, and more advanced native test environment features could enhance workflow, with smoother offline support and sync handling. Additionally, better performance for very large collections would be helpful, along with more intuitive navigation for enterprise-scale workspaces, stronger reporting analytics, easier management of permissions across large teams, and more flexible automation and testing report options would be beneficial. Small usability and performance improvements would make Postman Enterprise even more efficient for larger organizations. Postman Enterprise needs better performance optimization for large enterprises, more detailed analytics user reporting, improved API governance and audit visibility, simpler permissions and access control management, faster sync and loading times for larger collections, and more advanced built-in testing and reporting capabilities.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Director5672
    Director of Engineering at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "Postman offers great features, so I get a better opportunity to run bulk tasks through single command lines and single APIs, and we have an internal Postman AI tool, which helps improvise the code and analyze the quality if you find any errors."
    "The solution is stable and provides a good user experience."
    "Postman Enterprise positively impacts my organization as it saves our time, eliminating the need to check it manually."
    "Postman is very easy to use even for a person who doesn't have much knowledge or technical skills."
    "One of the most valuable aspects of Postman is scalability. We can scale the collection and for the multiple repositories of the collections."
    "Good at simulating the API code from a fictitious client application to check API behavior."
    "Postman is a great solution and resource for those who are new to technical platforms in terms of API development and testing."
    "The most valuable feature of Postman is the large libraries."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed."
    "It is a cloud-based environment for building and executing tests, which allows me to focus on building, running, and reviewing test results."
    "Environment initial variables allow our team to run tests against multiple environments on the fly."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."
    "Runscope is the best option for REST API automation."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments."
    "It has allowed us to go from no API tests to scheduled, automated tests integrated with PagerDuty in a few months."
    "Tests are per-step configurable with script capabilities and support for token-based authentication using variables. Configurable test frequency and integration with both Slack and PagerDuty for alerting our DevOps team are also important. General use of the dashboard by multiple team members is also valuable."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "One potential improvement for Postman Enterprise could be incorporating AI features into its advanced options."
    "We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB."
    "I live in Turkey, so for me, the value of dollar currency is high...Postman can change its pricing policy and decrease the prices for Turkey."
    "Postman is a bit more of a complex tool, making it an area where improvements can be made."
    "It is not that easy to use and should have a more improved easy-to-use interface."
    "Could be more user friendly."
    "If there is any way to have a record and playback feature through UI, as we do in Selenium and IDEs such as Eclipse, it would be great."
    "The performance needs to be improved."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "There are not many options for scalability."
    "File upload is a big part of the products that we test. The lack of file upload in Runscope requires us to still use UI (Selenium) automated tests for these scenarios."
    "If triggering test bucket via trigger API, there is no option to see if the tests which were triggered passed or failed."
    "I would like to see easier integration and display of test results so that the data could be shared via a dashboard within our company. (Some integration is possible, provided you use one of the supported platforms)."
    "The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work."
    "Reliability. I would like to see more money invested in disaster recovery testing of the application. The product should be hosted across several AWS regions so if there are issues with an EC2 instance in a particular region, the whole application won't be affected. Once or twice a year there are issues with AWS that causes the reliability of the application to suffer."
    "If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."
    "There have been some Runscope outages in the last year. Though not many, Runscope availability is of critical importance in our production context."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Postman is an open-source product. It is free to download from Google."
    "The solution has moderate pricing."
    "It is free."
    "This is an open source solution."
    "I am using the free option."
    "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
    "The solution is free for individuals, but for companies that use it across the organization, you have to pay per user."
    "Unlike APIs, the solution does not require a license."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    "Pricing is fair."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    12%
    Outsourcing Company
    11%
    Construction Company
    7%
    Comms Service Provider
    7%
    Outsourcing Company
    21%
    Financial Services Firm
    16%
    Construction Company
    14%
    Manufacturing Company
    10%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business18
    Midsize Enterprise13
    Large Enterprise45
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    Almost 30% of our time has been saved when it comes to complete regression testing of one feature. That is the rough estimate I can provide.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Postman?
    One area for improvement is that sometimes performance is slightly slow when we are handling large collections. Also, we need better integrations with CI/CD tools so that automation would be smooth...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 5% of the time
    Apigee vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apigee vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 4% of the time
    MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 4% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL] Logo
    AlertSite vs Runscope [EOL]
    Compared 51% of the time
    More Runscope [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    October 2026
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    October 2026
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.