PyCharm vs Veracode comparison

Read 208 Veracode reviews

30,728 Views
4,916 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Veracode and PyCharm operate within the software development space. Veracode appears to have an advantage in terms of comprehensive security features, while PyCharm stands out for developer productivity features.

Features: Veracode includes static and dynamic analysis tools, API integration for seamless automation, and supports various programming languages and platforms. It is especially adept at identifying vulnerabilities and aligning with DevOps workflows. PyCharm excels as an IDE offering intelligent coding features like robust code completion, testing, and debugging facilities primarily for Python. It integrates well with version control systems and supports a multitude of plugins enhancing the development experience.

Room for Improvement: Veracode struggles with false positives and has a complex pricing model. It faces integration challenges with APIs and lacks flexibility and scanning speed for newer programming languages. PyCharm is known for its high resource usage, necessitating better support for numerous programming languages and additional integrations, such as data science notebooks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode functions across multiple cloud environments and offers expert-level technical support, though response times can be slow. PyCharm typically operates on-premises or in public cloud settings and is known for an easy installation process, with generally agreeable support, albeit less so for resource-heavy scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode is perceived as expensive, offering value through enhanced security and compliance, with a quantifiable ROI attributed to decreased vulnerability instances. PyCharm provides a free Community edition and a paid Professional edition, which is deemed fairly priced given its feature set, potentially lowering costs through efficient coding and debugging support.

To learn more, read our detailed PyCharm vs. Veracode Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

PyCharm vs. Veracode

September 2026

Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (13th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of PyCharm is 2.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 10.7%, down from 21.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	10.7%
PyCharm	2.6%
Other	86.7%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Sahil Sanskar Jha

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Advanced machine learning workflows have become faster but still need better memory efficiency

In PyCharm, I find several components and libraries to be the most valuable. The support that Jupyter Notebook offers is essential, as we work through Jupyter regularly. Scientific libraries such as NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, and Plotly are integral to our work. Machine learning libraries including scikit-learn, PyTorch, and TensorFlow are used extensively. Hugging Face integration is particularly valuable because it is easily findable, the documentation is comprehensive, and it can be directly integrated with the IDEs we work with. The intelligent code editor in PyCharm definitely helps me manage code quality and efficiency in my projects. When using these libraries, it makes parallelization of data very efficient, allowing me to use multi-thread programming architecture. The code can work for multiple datasets rather than one at a time. With native Python code, a machine learning deployment taking 45 to 50 minutes to calculate can be efficiently reduced to a minute or half a second using these libraries.

Read full review

Yash Shende

Software Development Engineer II at Rocket Software

Monthly scans have provided baseline security but still miss critical vulnerabilities

Veracode can improve to stand in this market. They do not have to do much; they just need to improve their UI experience and add more documentation within the application rather than just creating documentation pages on different websites. They need to ensure their web application guides whoever uses it. Since whoever uses Veracode must be a technical person, they just need to guide them to the actual points. They can also improve their security capabilities by adding more filters to identify what vulnerabilities their application has. They need to improve their scanning engine to scan for more critical defects. Also, the integration part can be enhanced by adding features to integrate with a CLI, such as introducing a CLI version or a Jenkins plugin. If such features exist, they should show it as a pop-up, signaling that they have a new feature. Currently, it feels Veracode from two years ago is still the same, so that is something Veracode needs to improve. They can improve the security part. Some of the severe security issues were never caught by Veracode in the reports. In fact, I have never seen any high or critical severity issues pop up in my Veracode report. That is one thing they can improve on their scanning ability to catch high severity issues. Next is integration; Veracode does not provide any tools to integrate with Jenkins or CLI. I do not even know if there is any CLI for Veracode that I can use to automate in my pipeline. The last thing is the UI interface that they have, as it is a bit confusing. I remember we did not have the capability to handle authentications of our internal application. We had to write Selenium code using a Selenium IDE. To write a Selenium script for a Veracode scan, you have to download a Selenium IDE, record it, and then paste that file into Veracode. I can see that Selenium IDE is already decommissioned, so it is no longer used by anyone. Still, we have to use it because Veracode only supports that kind of file for Selenium to automate. They can add more ways to authenticate our application using normal JavaScript or Python or Shell script. I feel these are the four main points. They can document it more by adding tooltips into the application that explain why a parameter is required and what other options are available. For the same example with the Selenium script, they can add a link to their documentation that explains what other kinds of scripts can be written for authentication. I feel they can also make the UI more intuitive so that whoever uses it can guide themselves, as whoever uses Veracode is already a technical person.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The latest AI features and tab completion features are good."

"PyCharm is saving me time and money in general."

"The best feature of PyCharm is that it gives you hints whenever it detects any issues while you are coding. This is important because it helps us code faster and without any errors."

"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

"The solution provides a good comprehensive debugging feature that I like and which is easy to use."

"With native Python code, a machine learning deployment taking 45 to 50 minutes to calculate can be efficiently reduced to a minute or half a second using these libraries."

"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."

"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."

More PyCharm pros

"Good static analysis and dynamic analysis."

"In pipeline scanning, there is a configuration that can be set with respect to the security level of the flaw. If there is a high or a critical issue, there's a way the build can be failed and blocked before going into production."

"The capability to identify vulnerable code is the most valuable feature of Veracode."

"Before Veracode, the application was deployed to the production server and there would be a lot of bugs and issues. Once we implemented the Veracode scan, the full deployment issues were drastically reduced."

"I don't have much experience with the solution yet. We're looking at integrating Manual Penetration Testing with JIRA and Bamboo and then building that into a CICD model, so the integration is the most valuable feature so far."

"The solution is a specialist in SAST that you can rely on, and code scanning is fast with current, updated algorithms."

"In summary, I think that this is a good tool and I recommend it for helping with security in software development."

"The product helped improve our organization by helping us to identify potential problems in applications and fix them before they were used in a way that they should not be, and in essence, it helped enhance our security."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"The pricing model for PyCharm is a significant area for improvement. It is currently too high, with a per-seat cost of approximately 200 pounds."

"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."

"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."

"The solution is heavy because running it on laptops consumes a lot of memory and power. Typically, a laptop battery might last about eight to nine hours, but with the tool running, it reduces to two hours or one and a half hours at most. It is designed to handle large projects and heavy tasks, making it resource-intensive. For smaller projects, use IDEs like Visual Studio Code."

"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."

"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."

"The navigation can be better."

"Customizing the tool can make it complicated."

More PyCharm cons

"An area for improvement I found in Veracode is the connectivity because currently, my company uses a plugin for the dev-ops cloud-based connectivity. A pretty helpful feature would be if Veracode gives a direct code for connecting to the Oracle server directly and authenticating it via a unique server."

"Their technical support is less than stellar."

"They could improve how they fix vulnerabilities. They could have more support in place to help the developers."

"Number one, I need analytics, analytics, and more analytics. It is all about risk based management and better decision support, that is why."

"The scanning on the UI portion of our applications is straightforward, but folks were having challenges with scans that involved microservices. They had to rope in an expert to have it sorted."

"Another thing I need is continued support for the new languages today that are popular. Most of them are scripting languages more so than real, fourth-generation, commercial grade stuff; we're evolving. Most applications are using so much open-source that, quite frankly, it would be great to see Veracode, or anybody else, extend their platform to where they are able to help secure open-source platforms or repositories."

"Some important languages are not supported."

"Scheduling can be a little difficult. For instance, if you set up recurring scheduled scans and a developer comes in and says, "Hey, I have this critical release that happened outside of our normal release patterns and they want you to scan it," we actually have to change our schedule configuration and that means we lose the recurring scheduling settings we had."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"The community edition is free, which is good."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

"Compared to the typical software composition analysis solutions, Veracode is not so costly, although the static analysis part of it is a little costlier."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"The licensing and prices were upfront and clear. They stand behind everything that is said during the commercial phase and during the onboarding phase. Even the most irrelevant "that can be done" was delivered, no matter how important the request was."

"It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

"Its cost for what we needed it for was too high. It wasn't too high for other companies and it was competitively priced, but for us, it just didn't fit. We did plan to use it and increase the usage. In the end, it may have been abandoned because of the cost, but I'm not a hundred percent sure. So, even though we had planned on using it more and more, because of the cost and the business conditions of things, we didn't have the opportunity to really use it more."

"Pricing-wise, I find it a bit expensive because it's based on the number of users requesting access to Veracode."

"Veracode is affordable for large organizations, but its pricing may be out of reach for small and medium companies."

"I have not examined Veracode's pricing in detail, but from an industry perspective, I see that there is a tendency toward Veracode, which suggests competitive pricing."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

22%

University

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

A potential area of improvement in PyCharm at this point would be memory efficiency. PyCharm is based on its IntelliJ platform, which is Java-based, meaning it can be very memory-intensive, especia...

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

My main use case for PyCharm is for machine learning operations.

What advice do you have for others considering PyCharm?

I use PyCharm's debugging tools on a case-by-case basis. The libraries are generally documented well enough that in most cases when I am debugging, half of the errors are found by the IDE initially...

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Mend.io vs PyCharm

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs PyCharm

Compared 11% of the time

ReShaper vs PyCharm

Compared 8% of the time

Kiuwan Insights vs PyCharm

Compared 8% of the time

More PyCharm Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

Invicti vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

GitLab vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Download PyCharm product report

PyCharm

October 2026

Download Veracode product report

September 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

PyCharm is a powerful IDE designed for Python development, offering intelligent code analysis, seamless GitHub integration, and extensive support for frameworks like Django and Flask. Ideal for both beginners and professionals, it enhances coding efficiency and supports complex programming tasks.

PyCharm provides an integrated development environment that supports robotics, scientific computing, and machine learning. It features a built-in debugger and powerful AI-driven code completion, facilitating rapid prototyping and debugging. While it excels in many areas, users note challenges regarding system resource consumption and memory efficiency. Despite its pricing model, PyCharm remains a preferred choice for Python projects, thanks to its robust feature set and intuitive design.

What are PyCharm's key features?

Intelligent Code Analysis: Detects errors and suggests corrections in real-time.
Built-in Debugger: Offers a powerful tool for debugging complex code seamlessly.
Seamless GitHub Integration: Simplifies version control and collaboration.
Robust AI Features: Enhances productivity with AI-driven code completion.
Extensive Plugin Support: Customizes the environment for specific needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlines coding with features like context-aware code completion.
Support for Scientific Libraries: Provides efficiency in projects involving data processing and machine learning.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with tools like Grafana, Coverity, and Pylint.

In scientific fields, PyCharm aids data scientists and engineers with machine learning and algorithm optimization. Its support for Python frameworks and integration with other tools make it suitable for projects in robotics and data processing. Users often pair it with Visual Studio for tasks outside Python development.

JetBrains

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.