Safeguard by One Identity vs Veza comparison

Why PeerSpot?

One Identity and Veza are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Veza is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. One Identity holds a 4.4% mindshare in PAM, compared to Veza’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veza users who would recommend it.

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 91 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,618 Views
6,622 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Veza

Read 2 Veza reviews

5,504 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Veza

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Veza compete in the identity and access management sector. Data comparison suggests Veza has an upper hand due to comprehensive features justifying its cost.

Features: One Identity Safeguard offers robust privileged access management, session monitoring, and threat detection. Veza leads with granular access control, data-centric security, and advanced data controls.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard is noted for straightforward deployment and strong customer support. Veza provides a flexible deployment model suited to complex setups, though requiring deeper expertise initially.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is valued for its cost-effectiveness and good ROI with lower setup costs. Veza, while initially more expensive, delivers returns through advanced functionality appealing to those seeking scalability and security advances.

To learn more, read our detailed Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Ranking in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st)

Veza

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

26th

Ranking in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (23rd), Identity Management (IM) (23rd), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (9th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 4.4%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	4.4%
Veza	1.5%
Other	94.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

HarshalJethwa

Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Centralized access control has strengthened least privilege and streamlined audit compliance

The best features Veza offers in my experience are access visibility to see who can access what and which parts, relationship mapping of a user to roles, policies and resources, and risk detection such as over-permission and unused permission privileges. I can perform audit compliance using those features and the platform supports multiple platforms. Out of those features, I find risk detection to be the most valuable in my day-to-day work because I can check who has over-permission or unused permissions and understand relationship mapping and access visibility. Veza has positively impacted my organization by improving access for our users, allowing us to check the user and perform auditing for our system or organization. We are now able to implement least privilege practices, which has made our organization and system more secure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have successfully connected Identity Manager (IGA) to Safeguard to achieve Privilege Access Governance, making it possible by using an OOTB connector in Identity Manager to talk to the Safeguard system so I can govern the data from Safeguard and provision PAM accounts from Identity Manager to achieve a complete lifecycle."

"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."

"But otherwise, I think it is a good product and a good buy."

"Overall, the feedback from our users regarding One Identity Safeguard's usability and functionality has been positive."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"Overall, I have had a positive experience with Safeguard by One Identity, as the biggest benefit for us is strong control over privileged access, along with session monitoring and auditing capabilities, which has helped improve security and streamline privileged account management."

"By comparison, Safeguard is much better in terms of performance, networking, and server stability."

"I primarily use One Identity Safeguard for protecting security across all user accounts, enterprise data accounts, assets, as well as privileged access, domain user, and admin accounts, giving SSO features and providing security across all user accounts."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."

"Veza has positively impacted my organization by improving access for our users, allowing us to check the user and perform auditing for our system or organization, and we are now able to implement least privilege practices, which has made our organization and system more secure."

Cons

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it."

"The GUI has room for improvement because it is confusing and cumbersome."

"I think Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the user interface a little simpler and more intuitive, especially for new administrators."

"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

"One Identity's support is not appropriately structured, and it has a lot of room to improve."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

"Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems."

"The support experience could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Safeguard by One Identity is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the interface even easier to use, expanding reporting and analytics, and providing more customization options for access policies. It would be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is securing and managing user identities and access across the application with a focus on improving authentication, enforcing access control, and red...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is much higher and the setup is very complex.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veza?

Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems. Additionally, there are no e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veza?

My main use case for Veza is to use it for authentication and to determine who can access what and what can be accessed by the system or organization users. We set permissions for cloud platforms a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza

Compared 12% of the time

Lumos vs Veza

Compared 9% of the time

Idira IGA vs Veza

Compared 5% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza

Compared 5% of the time

Formalize vs Veza

Compared 5% of the time

More Veza Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM)

October 2026

Download Veza product report

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Veza Core Authorization Platform enhances data access visibility, centralizes control, and simplifies user permissions management. Its robust security through zero-trust principles, seamless integration, and automated compliance reporting boost organizational efficiency, productivity, and security, while streamlining workflows and minimizing vulnerabilities.

Veza

Sample Customers

Cavium

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza

September 2026

Free Report: Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza

Find out what your peers are saying about Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Safeguard by One Identity vs. Veza report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors and best Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.