SQL Server and SAP HANA are leading competitors in the database management system category. While SQL Server is noted for its broad usability and cost-effectiveness, SAP HANA holds the upper hand in high-performance scenarios due to its in-memory computing ability.
Features: SQL Server's key features include user-friendliness, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and strong capabilities in business intelligence and data analytics. SAP HANA's standout features are its in-memory computing for swift data processing, optimization, and performance, alongside robust integration capabilities with complex data operations.
Room for Improvement: SQL Server could improve in its cost-effectiveness, licensing complexities, and integration with non-Microsoft ecosystems. SAP HANA faces challenges with high costs and complex customization needs, along with room for improvement in user interface and integration with third-party tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQL Server offers flexibility with a variety of deployment models, backed by reliable customer support. SAP HANA focuses on hybrid models and cloud capabilities, providing comprehensive but complex customer service requiring deeper technical insight.
Pricing and ROI: SQL Server presents a cost-effective choice with significant ROI for small to medium enterprises, although its enterprise licenses may be expensive. SAP HANA is known for its higher costs, making it suitable primarily for enterprises that demand high performance and advanced capabilities.
We do not feel we're getting value for the investment due to the additional resources needed for integration and maintenance.
I have seen a return on investment with SAP HANA as it typically delivers measurable ROI, especially in finance and month-end close processes.
SAP HANA is a cost-saving solution that helps save money and serves as a time-saving solution that helps save time.
SQL Server is the most cost-effective with good human resource availability to manage it.
By utilizing SQL Server Agent for automation, Query Store for performance troubleshooting, and automated backup and restore maintenance jobs, routine SQL Server database administrator activities have become more consistent and require less manual intervention.
All applications need our repository to provide services for our online business or our customers, so the return is good.
The community support is better than the official SAP support.
While issues are resolved eventually, the first level of support is not as good as we would like.
When we raise a ticket for AWS or Azure issues, we find their support is very proactive, while SAP's support is quite passive.
I give their technical support a rating of ten out of ten.
There was a time when Microsoft support provided very crisp answers, but over time, they have diluted their support to third parties, leading to a drop in support quality.
Overall, I find this support reliable, especially for critical production issues, as Microsoft provides adequate documentation, troubleshooting resources, and structured support through support cases.
SAP HANA handles large data volumes efficiently, allowing for adding more modules or users without performance issues.
Our operations have grown from a hundred data operations a day to as many in a couple of seconds.
It depends on what needs to change in the structure, as some entities cannot be changed and require a new implementation, while others can be modified.
The server where we installed it has grown from 64 gigabytes in RAM to 256 gigabytes, demonstrating significant scalability capabilities.
Most of the time, they simply add another node in the availability group.
I can scale both horizontally and vertically without challenges.
We recently faced customer data loss during the cluster handover or failover fallback.
We have not had any problems in the last seven to eight years.
Regarding stability, they are using legacy systems and have implemented SAP HANA.
There was an issue with memory-optimized tables, but it was resolved in 2025, allowing you to remove that file group, which was not possible before.
All applications supporting SQL Server in my experience work very well across various industries including telecom, finance, banking, ad, entertainment, and workforce management.
SQL Server is absolutely stable.
The main issue is the ecosystem, which lacks the widespread support that SQL enjoys.
The setup process and deployment process for SAP HANA is complex.
Licensing costs with SAP HANA are very high.
It is fine to do a first release that works, but you cannot simply abandon it in the following years without service packs and improvements.
It would be valuable to have more intelligent, built-in recommendations for root cause analysis, indexing, blocking, and query optimization.
I would appreciate using Microsoft Pro as it can integrate with Excel or, with a simple query, consume information from the database using Microsoft Excel.
It's a recurring subscription model, which is expensive compared to legacy systems with just a maintenance fee.
SAP is not a cheap company, and its licenses are expensive.
I would rate the price for SAP HANA as high.
Cost savings on human resources for Windows plus SQL Server versus other solutions.
I think the pricing is high, but I am not sure how much our organization is paying, as I am not part of the management team.
My experience with SQL Server's pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it can be one of the more complex and expensive aspects of operating at an enterprise level.
This architecture allows for faster data processing and real-time analytics that were not possible with traditional databases.
The concept enhances speed, allowing the database to serve and move data quickly.
One of our dashboards using Excelsius was previously developed on normal BW on Oracle data, which took 10 minutes to open. After developing the same calculation views using those tables and replacing them with calculation views in Excelsius, the dashboard opened in seconds.
Always On HADR functionality is one of the features that I use on a daily basis and one of my most used features, saving me lots of time, especially since previously I had to build a SQL cluster and Windows clusters that had many dependencies on shared infrastructure, but now with Always On, it is too stable with easy management and almost zero maintenance, which SQL Server handles itself.
The feature I find most valuable in SQL Server is Query Store, especially for production performance troubleshooting, as it provides a historical view of query execution, duration, CPU, I/O, and the execution plan, allowing me to compare current performance with previous behavior.
I have been working with SQL Server for a long time, and it works well for me as I am using it in different applications, such as web applications, Windows applications, or the data warehouse reporting.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SQL Server | 10.3% |
| SAP HANA | 6.2% |
| Other | 83.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 119 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
| Large Enterprise | 122 |
SAP HANA is a high-speed in-memory data platform providing real-time analytics and quick data retrieval while supporting enterprise scalability and integration.
Designed for efficient data processing, SAP HANA offers robust security, ease of use, and advanced analytics through an architecture that ensures flexibility and stability. This allows seamless integration with third-party systems, significantly improving data management and decision-making capabilities. Enterprises benefit from data modeling, compression, comprehensive dashboards, and real-time insights. However, users have noted high costs, speed, and scalability issues, as well as complexity in interface and customizations. There's also a need for better integration with third-party tools, clearer documentation, and enhanced connectivity with Java and other platforms.
What are the key features of SAP HANA?SAP HANA is deployed for enterprise resource planning across industries, notably in finance, HR, and sales. It supports real-time analytics, business intelligence, and integrates with SAP ERP and S/4HANA, offering tailored solutions for sectors like supply chain management, CRM, procurement, and financial analysis.
SQL Server is a comprehensive database management system known for ease of use, robust performance, and seamless Microsoft integration, making it a preferred choice for data management and analysis needs.
SQL Server offers high availability with Always On availability groups and dynamic memory configuration. It integrates effortlessly with Microsoft products via tools like SSMS and Visual Studio. Supporting advanced features such as replication, clustering, and in-memory OLTP, it provides a versatile platform for managing and analyzing significant data volumes securely and efficiently. While it shines in integration with .NET applications and business intelligence, there are opportunities to improve its scalability and integration with open-source platforms. Its licensing costs can be a barrier, and enhancements to management tools for non-technical users, along with better setup processes, would increase its appeal.
What are SQL Server's most important features?SQL Server is implemented across industries for database management, data warehousing, and business intelligence. Companies in finance, ERP, and cloud deployments leverage its capabilities for transactional processing, .NET program integration, and reporting. Enterprises particularly benefit from its scalability and cost-efficiency when integrated with Azure for small and medium-sized operations.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
