No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Seeq vs TigerGraph comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seeq
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TigerGraph
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data and Analytics Service Providers category, the mindshare of Seeq is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TigerGraph is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data and Analytics Service Providers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Seeq1.5%
TigerGraph0.9%
Other97.6%
Data and Analytics Service Providers
 

Featured Reviews

Suradech Kongkiatpaiboon - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Process Engineer at Chevron
Centralized analytics has transformed time series optimization and collaboration across teams
In my opinion, the best feature Seeq offers is the ability to visualize time series data in an efficient way. If we code it by ourselves, it will take a very long time or require a lot of server capacity, and you cannot simply plot a time series of, say, 100,000 records on your own simply because it takes a lot of effort to do that. Analyzing it when we apply any formula or algorithm takes more time to finalize everything. Seeq does this through drag and drop and point and click actions. So, it is much easier to do it by using this tool. Seeq has positively impacted my organization because I see many people using it, compared to the past five years when we had only PI Vision for visualizing time series data. Manipulating time series data was such a critical task that not many people were familiar with and were afraid to do. This task remains a core critical function for everyone to do it efficiently in order to complete anything. Process optimization and reliability analysis would address all failure modes.
Pranay Jain - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior software engineer at Simplify vms
Graph analytics have transformed fraud detection and real-time insights for transaction data
The best feature of TigerGraph is the interconnectivity, which is very good for our needs as we were looking for highly connected data such as customer transactions. We needed our database to provide solutions for complex relationship queries quickly, and we can scale it with a large dataset. We adopted TigerGraph because it has massively parallel processing, real-time graph analytics, and deep link multi-hop queries. I find the GSQL query feature to be the most reliable because it is a powerful SQL-like query language designed for graph analytics and complex pattern matching, which is the best aspect of TigerGraph. Scalability is one of the key factors why we chose TigerGraph, as it provides fast analytics when the dataset increases and meets our needs very well.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Seeq has positively impacted my organization by making work more effective, as it used to take months to collect data, model, and filter, but now Seeq saves time, allowing us to complete tasks in a week or less."
"Compared to any other platform, Seeq is the best and most adaptive."
"Seeq has provided visibility to the key performance indicators and visualization of those critical pointers in our dashboards."
"Prior to switching, the same amount of work that takes three to four hours on Seeq would have taken a day or two on PI Vision, representing significant manpower reduction, with one person able to oversee fifty to sixty assets at once, compared to needing four or five people for the same job with other tools."
"My advice to other professionals considering implementing Seeq is that they should definitely go for it, because among the tools on the market, it is very easy to integrate, easy to scale, and easy to visualize in different environments."
"AI is great in Seeq. You have a good feature that allows you to convert a Python algorithm built in Seeq Data Lab into a user-friendly interface."
"Seeq is a friendly and useful tool."
"It is a user-friendly tool, and Seeq is a good application where we can easily access it."
"A specific result that reflects this positive impact on my company's market position is that I have almost a 100% win rate on bids for projects that involve graphs, thanks to my experience with TigerGraph."
"TigerGraph allows you to specify the schema using SQL, similar to how you would with a relational data model, and once you draw your graph model and load the data, you can experiment faster with their available machine learning algorithms using a GUI-driven approach, which makes progress with TigerGraph much easier."
"One of the key features that differentiates TigerGraph from traditional databases is the way it has been architected, as it does not rely on traditional rows and columns but rather on graphical architecture, which sets it apart from normal relational databases, helping us with analytics and analysis, making it better in terms of performance and processing capabilities."
"The best features that I found useful in TigerGraph include their already provided algorithms, the user-friendly interface for visualizing graphs, and the ease of connecting nodes and edges by their properties attributes."
"TigerGraph has positively impacted my organization through numerous applications in AI, fintech, insurance, and crypto-related use cases."
"My experience with TigerGraph has been exceptional, and I believe more focused enablement and diverse use cases will encourage broader adoption and implementation across various projects."
"Traditional methods for identifying fraud have resulted in a decrease in false positives of over 50 percent, and when it comes to execution speed, latency reduction exceeds 200 percent after implementing TigerGraph."
"Since we needed to reduce the query execution time in our application, it has reduced it by up to 60%, data relationship analysis that used to take minutes is now reduced to seconds, and we can process multiple millions of relationships in real-time, which provides significant value."
 

Cons

"I appreciate the question on how Seeq can be improved. The first thing is their graphical user interface. They invest so much in their backbone, but without a good dashboard or visualization tool, it feels insufficient."
"But customers who purchase Seeq and expect its dashboarding feature to be competitive with Power BI and Grafana might be disappointed."
"In terms of needed improvements, for machine monitoring, we used to create our own software to conduct monitoring."
"Seeq could incorporate more closed-loop solutions."
"Seeq could work on the reporting format and dashboard."
"I have noticed that Seeq sometimes struggles with connectivity issues, leading to data gaps."
"As for improvements, I felt there should be a more efficient way to address repetitive customer questions, perhaps using chatbot technology to streamline responses."
"I think Seeq could improve by including a section that has SQL-type visualizations to visualize tables of data and not reference them to the timestamp, as that has caused us some problems at times."
"TigerGraph does not have enough number of experts, and in terms of the usability of the product, they are still evolving."
"TigerGraph can be improved by adding features for multi-updates and in-place upgrades when documents are inserted."
"That part is actually really important, as TigerGraph is very naive and it is somewhat a beta product. It has always been a beta product, even when they have released so many versions, it was very problematic."
"TigerGraph as a product is currently limited in its modularity, being heavily AWS focused, and since we are on Google Cloud Platform, this caused some challenges during setup, although TigerGraph as a service was very proactive in assisting with this."
"I chose a rating of eight out of ten mainly because documentation, more demos, and improved customer approachability still present opportunities for improvement."
"TigerGraph could improve by making the community version more complete and not limited to a monolithic service."
"TigerGraph can be improved by providing more tutorials about G-SQL."
"GraphStudio has UI/UX issues and bugs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
"The pricing is average."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data and Analytics Service Providers solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Construction Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
19%
Construction Company
8%
Media Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Seeq?
I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging. If Seeq had an easier way to modify our tag structure, then duplicating reports onto simila...
What is your primary use case for Seeq?
My main use case for Seeq is incident investigations. Upon unexpected quality results, incident investigations can start to determine where the incident first began occurring. Seeq allows the retro...
What advice do you have for others considering Seeq?
My advice to others looking into using Seeq is to pursue it. There are more opportunities with your own equipment than you know without examining them through the lens of Seeq. I would rate this pr...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TigerGraph?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I was involved with the licensing part primarily. I recommended the solution, but pricing and setup costs were determined by our financial team.
What needs improvement with TigerGraph?
I cannot really say much about needed improvements for TigerGraph in my current work. I think it has great adaptation with AI. If I had to pick at something, it might be more AI integration, but ov...
What is your primary use case for TigerGraph?
I have been using TigerGraph for roughly seven years, and I was one of the first people in the first batch of cohorts to get certified in TigerGraph. My main use case for TigerGraph is for fraud de...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Seeq vs. TigerGraph and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.