AppViewX AUTOMATION+ vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

AppViewX and Red Hat are both solutions in the Network Automation category. AppViewX is ranked #27, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. AppViewX holds a 1.3% mindshare in NA, compared to Red Hat’s 14.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AppViewX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

AppViewX AUTOMATION+

Read 1 AppViewX AUTOMATION+ review

569 Views
546 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

19,432 Views
5,830 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AppViewX AUTOMATION+

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AppViewX AUTOMATION+ compete in the automation and orchestration domain. Based on data comparisons, AppViewX AUTOMATION+ offers superior features that justify its investment despite Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform being preferred for pricing and support.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valued for strong integration capabilities, broad compatibility with various ecosystems, and extensive documentation. AppViewX AUTOMATION+ provides advanced orchestration, enhanced security features, and a comprehensive suite for automation needs. The key difference lies in AppViewX AUTOMATION+'s advanced features offering more functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppViewX AUTOMATION+ offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer service support emphasizing speedy resolution times. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides a more complex deployment model but is supported by extensive documentation and a robust support network. AppViewX AUTOMATION+ offers a more seamless deployment experience while Red Hat Ansible's support network is highly reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is noted for its competitive pricing structure facilitating quicker ROI. AppViewX AUTOMATION+ has a higher initial setup cost but delivers substantial value through feature richness and efficiencies, offering a strong ROI. The primary distinction is that Red Hat Ansible is more cost-effective upfront, while AppViewX AUTOMATION+ justifies its pricing with enhanced capabilities and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Automation Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AppViewX AUTOMATION+

Ranking in Network Automation

27th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Network Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (3rd), Configuration Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Automation category, the mindshare of AppViewX AUTOMATION+ is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 14.3%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	14.3%
AppViewX AUTOMATION+	1.3%
Other	84.4%

Network Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer1292271

Network Architect at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good automation, statistics gathering, and reporting, with helpful technical support

The initial setup is simple. It took a few weeks to set up and test, before going live. There is some maintenance required. We have to allocate the storage often. We have a team within App Ux, the vendor, who supports us, and the engineering team within the F5M security team manages that.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you are a heavy user of eCommerce services, use cloud-based solutions, and you would like a central point with a single pane of glass to get any kind of statistics or visibility around your applications, this solution is a good tool."

"The features that I have found to be the most valuable are the collecting of statistics, reporting, and implementing changes to particular environments on a scheduled basis with no manual intervention."

"It is quick to production. It has an API in the back which allows for integrations."

"Ansible Galaxy is helpful for roles and Git Submodules: No dependency in managing playbooks. Also, fact caching in redis for host/role grp information speeds up execution. Finally, variable management is easy."

"Installing it is a PIP command. So, it's pretty easy. It is a one liner."

"Ansible automation has benefited our organization."

"Role-based access control and agentless architecture are the main features which may attract users."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."

"It is all modular-based. If there is not a module for it today, someone will write it."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"Anything to do with storage needs improvement. Storage is always very expensive; it fills up a lot and it's not very good at cloud-based solutions."

"Anything to do with storage needs improvement."

"Accessibility. Ansible uses a CLI by default. Those accustomed to it can find their way and adopt the YAML files easily over time. But, some users are more comfortable using UIs..."

"The support could be better."

"The tool should allow us to create infrastructure. It has everything when it comes to management, but it lacks the provisioning aspect."

"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."

"In modern infrastructure, there are more than just servers. The initial server-centric approach in Ansible is a bit strange."

"Ansible is great, but there are not many modules. You can do about 80% to 90% of things by using commands, but more modules should be added. We cannot do some of the things in Ansible. In Red Hat, we have the YUM package manager, and there are certain options that we can pass through YUM. To install the Docker Community Edition, I'll write the yum install docker-ce command, but because the Docker Community Edition is not compatible with RHEL 8, I will have to use the nobest option, such as yum install docker-ce --nobest. The nobest option installs the most stable version that can be installed on a particular system. In Ansible, the nobest option is not there. So, it needs some improvements in terms of options. There should be more options, keywords, and modules."

"If we have a problem with some file and we need to get Red Hat to analyze the issue and the file is 100GBs, we'll have an issue since we need to provide a log file for them to analyze. If it is around 12GB or 13GB, we can easily upload it to the Red Hat portal. With more than 100GBs, it will fail. I heard it should cover up to 250GB for an upload, however, I find it fails. Therefore, Red Hat needs to provide a way to handle this."

"It could be easier to integrate Ansible with other solutions. No single tool can do everything. For example, we use Terraform for infrastructure and other solutions for configuration management and VMs."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable. It's not cheap, but it's not expensive, it's in the middle."

"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

"The pricing is okay."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"I am using the community edition of the solution which is free."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware NSX vs AppViewX AUTOMATION+

Compared 50% of the time

More AppViewX AUTOMATION+ Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

September 2026

Download AppViewX AUTOMATION+ product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

October 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

AUTOMATION+

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

AppViewX AUTOMATION+ simplifies IT operations with robust automation capabilities designed to enhance efficiency and reduce risks in network and application management.

AppViewX AUTOMATION+ offers powerful automation tools for optimizing infrastructure, enabling teams to streamline processes, enhance security, and achieve greater control over network ecosystems. This technology drives efficiency by automating routine tasks, reducing manual intervention, and minimizing human errors. It's designed for rapid deployment and integration with existing ecosystems, facilitating seamless scalability and adaptability across diverse environments.

What are the most important features of AppViewX AUTOMATION+?

Workflow Automation: Streamlines complex processes through pre-configured templates and low-code designs.
Certificate Lifecycle Management: Automates certificate procurement, installation, and renewal processes.
API Integration: Offers extensive API support for smooth integration into existing IT infrastructure.
Role-based Access Control: Ensures security compliance by defining user permissions and access levels.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from AppViewX AUTOMATION+?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing manual workload and increasing automation.
Time Savings: Speeds up deployments and updates, enhancing productivity.
Improved Security: Reduces vulnerabilities through automated compliance checks and governance.
Scalability: Facilitates growth and adaptation to changing business needs.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, AppViewX AUTOMATION+ is deployed to automate and secure network operations, overcoming challenges like compliance and scalability. These industries benefit significantly by implementing this technology to streamline certification processes, automate routine maintenance, and enhance operational efficiency.

AppViewX

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Ups, Uber, BMW Group, MetLife, tieto

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Cisco, Broadcom and others in Network Automation. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Automation vendors.

We monitor all Network Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.