Azure Backup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Azure Backup

Read 60 Azure Backup reviews

6,607 Views
6,343 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Azure Backup

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] and Azure Backup are both contenders in the backup and recovery solutions category. Quest Rapid Recovery seems to have the upper hand in on-premises solutions with diverse mounting and restoration options, while Azure Backup shines with its cloud-native capabilities and integration flexibility.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery is known for its granular recovery points, the ability to mount backups as drives, and integration with virtual environments. Azure Backup excels in cloud integration, ease of configuration, and scalability, offering seamless integration with other Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in GUI stability, better support, and file-level backup capabilities. Azure Backup could improve compression rates, support for on-premises services, and application-level integrations. Users also seek faster restore processes and improved customer notifications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Rapid Recovery primarily focuses on on-premises deployment with mixed feedback on technical support responsiveness. Azure Backup offers flexible deployments across cloud types and is praised for customer service, though technical support response times could improve.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery is seen as expensive for virtual backups, requiring fees for maintenance and support, but it's valued for data protection ROI. Azure Backup operates on a consumption-based model with competitive pricing, offering flexibility and careful management to optimize cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (18th)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Has supported secure data storage with incremental backups and centralized monitoring

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me. The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios. One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

Read full review

Ujwal Sawant

Technical Manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd

Reliable and efficient for our data backup needs

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as an eight out of ten. During our initial setup of Quest Rapid Recovery, we encountered some smaller issues, mainly related to version compatibility and system changes. Setting up Quest Rapid Recovery was quick and done within a day. We started by ensuring the required prerequisites were in place. One server was dedicated to Rapid Recovery, and another acted as a proxy for communication. After installing the Rapid Recovery client on both servers and establishing communication, we configured settings and set up a backup schedule, deciding on file-level or full backups as needed. The process was straightforward, making the deployment efficient and completed within a day. One person with the right skills is all it takes for the deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are happy with this product and have not found any issues while using it."

"From a day-to-day operation perspective, the installation and configuration of the Azure Backup and the backup timing are great."

"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."

"The feature I find most effective in Azure Backup is the high-level restore."

"Enables immediate recovery and immediate restoration."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its simplicity."

"I like that it's a simple system."

"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."

More Azure Backup pros

"Basically, half of my day is saved because of the email notification and alerts."

"Customer Service: So far, I've found both the online forums and Dell Community pages and the Dell knowledge base pretty extensive, and all our direct support with Dell techs has been quick and so far very helpful."

"Not having to switch tapes is wonderful. It makes it so easy. We have an on-prem deployment that we also replicate to an offsite replication host. So by not having to deal with tapes and moving them off-site every day and every week, that's amazing ease of use for us."

"The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building."

"The data protection strategy varies on a case-by-case basis, but overall, it's doing well."

"You can go for this solution; it is a very dependable solution, and we can be confident that this recovery software is working very well."

"It has surpassed our expectations time and time again."

"The solution offers a 100% guarantee that if it's backed up you will be able to restore it onto any platform you want."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

Cons

"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."

"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."

"I would like to have the option to increase the frequency of the backups. Azure Backup does backups on an hourly basis, but I would prefer it to take backups more often."

"Areas of Azure Backup that have room for improvement include the VM backup, which creates multiple snapshots. When I select a snapshot every two days, it creates numerous snapshots, but during restoration, it provides only very few of them for the full restore."

"The extensibility onto hybrid environments needs a bit of tweaking for those on-prem."

"The price of this solution should be lowered because it is the biggest complaint from my customers."

"The solution is still in its infancy; it's not a mature product yet."

"I can’t use the solution to restore another native cloud solution. Azure must add this new feature."

More Azure Backup cons

"The archive feature is a little cryptic. I don't think that it is very understandable."

"Rapid Recovery can only backup the machine or disc, but it can't back up from folders, and files, and things like that."

"The on-premises deployment model shouldn't have a maintenance fee. If there's going to be technical support, they need it to be free or it should be paid on upon adopting the solution."

"It's buggy. That's a big problem. We're arranging to get rid of it. We're going to switch to Veeam."

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"It would be nice if you could deploy the agent without having to reboot."

"It is quite surprising to me that the configuration cannot be backed up automatically, and I think that Rapid Recovery should have an option for scheduled configuration backup."

"Sometimes, when we have certain batches for Windows, it needs to be restarted. When it's restarted, the service is configured as a delayed start. Sometimes, you need to wait too long until it rights itself, or you have to do it manually."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future."

"Price-wise, it's similar to AWS."

"Pay as you go is the pricing model."

"We are paying about $100,000 USD per year, just for a couple of servers."

"The product's pricing is a three or four out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is costly."

"We do not have any additional costs for Azure Backup."

"The price is somewhat high and could be lower."

"It is a very cheap cloud solution."

More Azure Backup pricing and cost advice

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Backup?

Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention. Restoration times require manual backup and manual interventions, and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Azure Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Azure Backup

Compared 6% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Azure Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Backup Competitors

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup

October 2026

Download Azure Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

October 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell AppAssure

Overview

Azure Backup provides efficient data protection with features like fast recovery and encryption. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering scalable, secure storage solutions. Users benefit from straightforward configurations and flexible retention, although improvements in hybrid integration are needed.

Azure Backup stands out with its comprehensive data protection capabilities, including features such as incremental backups and geo-replication. It ensures consistent security and performance through its scalability and redundancy. Users find the platform cost-effective and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services. While Azure Backup excels in many areas, such as ease of use and robust monitoring, challenges persist in hybrid environment integration and application-level backups.

What key features does Azure Backup offer?

Ease of use: Features straightforward configuration and incremental backups.
Fast recovery: Supports rapid data restoration with geo-replication.
Advanced protection: Provides encryption and flexible retention options for data security.
Seamless integration: Works well with Azure services for a unified experience.
User-friendly management: Offers robust monitoring and reporting tools.

What advantages should users expect from Azure Backup?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides affordable data protection solutions.
Scalability: Ensures consistent performance with cloud scalability.
Security: Enhances data security with advanced encryption features.
Efficiency: Simplifies backup processes with efficient scheduling.

Azure Backup is widely used in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as financial services, healthcare, and government. It is ideal for organizations looking to back up virtual machines, manage disaster recovery, or support cloud migrations. Its adaptability allows businesses to safeguard SAP workloads and SQL databases efficiently.

Microsoft

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.