No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cube vs QlikView comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cube
Ranking in Embedded BI
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
AI Data Analysis (18th)
QlikView
Ranking in Embedded BI
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Reporting (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of Cube is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 6.7%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Embedded BI Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
QlikView6.7%
Cube0.9%
Other92.4%
Embedded BI
 

Featured Reviews

Amir Hassan - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Scientist / Data Analytics Consultant at Fiverr International Ltd
Managing complex data hierarchies has improved analytics but still needs richer hierarchy types
To evaluate Cube's efficiency in handling large data volumes, I use metrics including F1 scores, AUC (Area Under the Curve), and RMC (Root Mean Squares), along with RSE (Root Square Errors). These factors help me gauge the efficiency of the algorithms clearly. Regarding improving Cube, I believe that when we are building hierarchies, I should enhance the type of hierarchies. For instance, in a few countries lacking state systems, there could be a hierarchy without proper categorization—such as continent, country, and city. Therefore, it would be beneficial if I could improve the hierarchies to retrieve data as quickly as possible from Cube.
SG
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Daily invoice analytics has become streamlined and complex data modeling is now simplified
We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only tabular presentation of data because that is what we need. Presenting a large volume of data in QlikView with graphics can be overwhelming for the majority of people who want to see a lot of information in one picture. It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView. However, I think they will decommission QlikView, and AI features are already available in Qlik Sense, so you would need to migrate to that platform.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Implementation was super smooth, and within two weeks we were up and running and the metrics were exposed in our app."
"NPS improved to approximately eight out of ten for our feature, and internally ticket handling times decreased, allowing reallocation of resources to higher-impact projects."
"Cube completes my tasks very easily and takes less time, allowing me to deliver any project in a timely manner to our clients."
"The security provided by Cube has helped my organization by allowing us to use NATed IP on Cube to send outside the public IP while keeping the internal IP safe in our on-premise environment."
"Cube's caching mechanism impacts my database query loads and response times significantly."
"Data Discovery has allowed us to enrich the analysis of data and discover new ways to generate new KPIs."
"Once you open it up, you see everything that you can do."
"The most valuable aspect is its extensive library on Microsoft, providing a robust framework for implementation."
"If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money."
"The productivity-to-cost ratio is much higher with QlikView."
"It is easy and fast to build dashboards."
"Working in the IT environment gets challenging especially when you have multiple sources of data that you need to combine, and QlikView makes this really easy and simple to do because QlikView has its own ETL modeler built into it, so having an all-in-one tool is quite an advantage."
"QlikView is a highly effective management tool, allowing a broad area of analysis."
 

Cons

"When it comes to the initial setup of Cube, I faced some challenges, including server issues when uploading data from local sources to the Unipi servers."
"I did not see any return on investment from Cube."
"Cube can be improved by enhancing data refresh over multiple tabs."
"Cube's interface can be challenging for non-technical users, needing clearer use-case examples to ease integration into workflows."
"There is no way to create a real template that is not exposed directly in the UI."
"Cube can be improved as it lacks some features."
"The security features in QlikView are not yet mature: very complex to define permissions in a dashboard (based on data/sheets)."
"I would like to see more ‘drag and drop’ functionality as, in my opinion, there is still too much coding required to join tables correctly."
"Sometimes it creates problem when many users log in at same time, but this also depends on your RAM capacity."
"The license cost is very high."
"Server performance. Reloading of data sometimes weigh down the server's performance."
"The solution is quite costly."
"There could be a feature to analyze the sales and accounting data of the client."
"Some features are a bit tedious to achieve results, especially for new users and people who have not had training or experience in using the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."
"The pricing is moderate, in the medium price range."
"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."
"Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."
"QlikView is a reasonably priced solution."
"QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."
"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."
"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user79932 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees
Feb 4, 2015
Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho
1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise76
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cube?
The cost is around $1,500 per month. The exact number is not coming to my mind, but it is approximately $1,500 or $200 per month.
What needs improvement with Cube?
To evaluate Cube's efficiency in handling large data volumes, I use metrics including F1 scores, AUC (Area Under the Curve), and RMC (Root Mean Squares), along with RSE (Root Square Errors). These ...
What is your primary use case for Cube?
In my recent projects with Cube, I was tasked with finding crashes and the reasons behind them using three datasets: people, crash, and vehicles. I had to merge them and preprocess them, clean and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
What needs improvement with QlikView?
We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only t...
What is your primary use case for QlikView?
The primary use case involves analyzing data on a daily invoice level with QlikView. Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cube vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.