No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs InfoScale comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracl...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
InfoScale
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (30th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (3rd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is 3.0%. The mindshare of InfoScale is 20.9%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
InfoScale20.9%
FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC3.0%
Other76.1%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

JF
Senior Database Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Cloud migrations have become faster and active-active databases achieve near-zero downtime
FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is very secure regarding its AI capabilities. Most products today rely on cloud migration or are connected to AI, so I believe it is quite safe. Of course, there is room for improvement. The accuracy and reliability of FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC has been excellent. In my experience, the accuracy and reliability have been all positive, and I have no negative things to say about it. It is very helpful and secure. FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is deployed in my organization in a hybrid and private cloud environment. I use Azure and AWS as my cloud providers. My advice to others looking to use FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is that I believe a trial period for every database administrator would be valuable. Everyone might love the solution if given the opportunity to try it. I rate FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC eight out of ten because while there is room for improvement, it was easy to navigate and accomplish automated infrastructure deployment, which was very helpful.
TJ
Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India
Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover
Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC was very helpful in solving the shared disk problem."
"The stability and performance of the cluster during testing were impressive."
"I saved $50,000 per Oracle RAC cluster per annum using FlashGrid, which includes both storage cost, compute cost, and also manpower cost."
"From a recovery standpoint, InfoScale is excellent and easy to manage."
"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."
"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."
"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."
"It's a stable solution."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."
"Over the last two years, we did not experience any application failover or receive alerts due to the immediate switchover mechanism in active-active mode that ensures no downtime, helping us significantly with confidence and trust in our organization."
 

Cons

"One weakness is that there might be performance degradation once I install Oracle RAC in the public cloud using FlashGrid; that is one weakness I have encountered after migrating to the public cloud with FlashGrid."
"There is room for improvement in the area of migration or integration with existing on-premises infrastructure."
"I believe FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC can be improved by providing better guidance on how to utilize it smoothly, especially regarding the learning curve."
"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."
"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."
"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."
"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."
"It could be more stable and more secure."
"It's very difficult to implement."
"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."
"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
I am not part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing decisions for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC. I have only been delegated to use it, so I cannot provide comments on that.
What needs improvement with FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
I believe FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC can be improved by providing better guidance on how to utilize it smoothly, especially regarding the learning curve. Adding resources for understanding ho...
What is your primary use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
My main use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is cloud migrations and active-active high availability across multiple availability zones. I use FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC for spreadin...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...
What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?
InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...
What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?
My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...
 

Also Known As

FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on OL 9), FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on RHEL 9)
Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Wayne State University, Zenith Mart
Find out what your peers are saying about FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs. InfoScale and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.