Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Microsoft Sentinel comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Microsoft are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Fortinet is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 73% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Fortinet FortiSOAR and Microsoft Sentinel compete in the security operations and incident response category. Microsoft Sentinel has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, outweighing FortiSOAR's pricing and support benefits.

Features: Fortinet FortiSOAR offers powerful orchestration and automation, wide connector availability, and a user-friendly interface. Microsoft Sentinel provides advanced analytics, Azure integration, and efficient AI-based threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiSOAR could enhance its scalability, expand cloud integrations, and improve analytics capabilities. Microsoft Sentinel might reduce its learning curve, optimize pricing structure, and simplify certain integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiSOAR ensures straightforward deployment and robust support, easing integration. Microsoft Sentinel benefits from cloud-based deployment via Azure but involves a steeper learning curve for Azure newcomers.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSOAR presents competitive pricing and solid ROI for automation-focused businesses. Microsoft Sentinel, though higher in cost, justifies the investment with its extensive features and integration with Microsoft tools, appealing to enterprises within Microsoft ecosystems.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Featured Reviews

AdityaDesai

Solutions Architect at ProArch

Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency

Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.

Read full review

VIJAICYRIAC

Director at Movate

Automated playbooks have reduced response times and provided deeper threat analytics

The effectiveness of Fortinet FortiSOAR playbooks is that they minimize the mean time to response and MTTR, and I think more automation is required to improve the response time. I am working with the Dynamic Case Management feature, and it is dynamic. The Dynamic Case Management feature is more helpful for us to get real-time anomalies and identify the threats. It also assists in real-time response, so it is helpful.

Read full review

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at HR Software Solution

Centralized monitoring has improved threat response but cost control still needs refinement

Based on real operations used in our corporate IT environment, the key features include log correlation and incident view. Microsoft Sentinel's biggest strength is how it correlates multiple related alerts into a single incident. This significantly reduces alert noise and helps the SOC focus on real threats instead of isolated events. Another valuable feature is KQL-based threat hunting with Kusto Query Language. The flexibility of this language allows us to build custom hunting queries based on our environment's behavior. This is extremely useful for detecting low and slow threats or hidden threats that default rules may miss. Cloud-native scalability and stability is another important feature. Being cloud-native, Microsoft Sentinel scales well for medium to large corporate environments without infrastructure management. Stability has been solid in day-to-day production. SOAR automation using playbooks is a feature we highly recommend. Microsoft Sentinel's SOAR functionality helps automate repetitive SOC tasks like alert enrichment and notification. This saves analyst time and improves response consistency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I liked the most about Torq is the actual workflow builder, which is really great because they offer a lot of features and convenience features that are useful for any automation engineer."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"Under one SOC tool in Torq, analysts get to know everything within the context of an alert or incident they are working on, and this ability to view the whole picture within Torq is one of the major breakthroughs and best offerings of Torq."

"Torq has exceeded expectations by delivering workflows in a timely and lower effort manner than XSOAR, and it meets all my needs while saving a ton of time and targeting $600,000 saved this year, which is a substantial amount of money."

"Torq's unified platform approach to AI, SOAR, automation, and case management is superior compared to my experience managing multiple point solutions."

"Torq has changed the day-to-day experience for my security analysts and me by saving literally thousands of man-hours per month since we have implemented some of these use cases."

"Torq offers the best feature through integration with AI."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

More Torq pros

"The solution has many connectors, which is quite helpful."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is a very interactive and user-friendly solution."

"The solution's most valuable feature is playbook creation, which allows us to integrate all data ingestion into the same platform."

"We use the product for security."

"The product is expensive, but it is a value-for-money product, a good product to invest in, eventually securing your environment and helping to protect against untoward security incidents."

"The fabrication, management, and communication across a single platform is beautiful."

"The brand value that Fortinet has, it has the reputation of being a reasonably priced product, and they have an enormous customer base in India."

"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR pros

"Having everything streamlined can be time-saving."

"Sentinel also enables you to ingest data from your entire ecosystem and not just from the Microsoft ecosystem. It can receive data from third-party vendors' products such firewalls, network devices, and antivirus solutions. It's not only a Microsoft solution, it's for everything."

"The integration between them is good and straightforward, the documentation is excellent, and we do not have any problems."

"Microsoft Sentinel has positively impacted my organization by improving visibility across all security logs, reducing incident response time through automation, and enabling faster threat detection, which has strengthened our overall security posture and reduced the manual workload for the SOC team."

"Sentinel enables us to ingest data from our entire ecosystem. In addition to integrating our Cisco ASA Firewall logs, we get our Palo Alto proxy logs and some on-premises data coming from our hardware devices... That is very important and is one way Sentinel is playing a wider role in our environment."

"The connectivity and analytics are great."

"Sentinel is the best solution that we use."

"Native integration with Microsoft security products or other Microsoft software is also crucial. For example, we can integrate Sentinel with Office 365 with one click. Other integrations aren't as easy. Sometimes, we have to do it manually."

More Microsoft Sentinel pros

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding the pricing of Torq, I would say it is expensive."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"If Torq could enhance its AI features, it would benefit customers significantly by making the platform even more user-friendly."

"What has not worked as well as I hoped with Torq is related to product data management and storing data, although it still provides faster response and saves time."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"There are some issues and bugs that I think need to be fixed, but they are currently not focused on it."

"The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially, and creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers."

More Torq cons

"Fortinet FortiSOAR should add more documentation for some use cases."

"I have found that Fortinet FortiSOAR needs a lot of improvement. The orchestration needs to be improved and most of its functionalities are yet to be operational, I have tried to click on the icons but they do not work."

"The UI design of the solution needs to be changed since it can get difficult for a newbie to operate."

"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The solution lacks proper documentation, so we have to test and trial each playbook and integration."

"The ease of playbook creation on FortiSOAR needs improvement."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR cons

"The reporting could be more structured."

"We do see continuous improvement all the time, however, I haven't got a specific feature that is lacking or not well designed."

"There is a wider thing called Jupyter Notebooks, which is around the automation side of things. It would be good if there are playbooks that you can utilize without having to have the developer experience to do it in-house. Microsoft could provide more playbooks or more Jupyter Notebooks around MITRE ATT&CK Framework."

"The solution could improve the playbooks."

"We do have in-built or out-of-the-box metrics that are shown on the dashboard, but it doesn't give the kind of metrics that we need from our environment whereby we need to check the meantime to detect and meantime to resolve an incident. I have to do it manually. I have to pull all the logs or all the alerts that are fed into Sentinel over a certain period. We do this on a monthly basis, so I go into Microsoft Sentinel and pull all the alerts or incidents we closed over a period of thirty days."

"Microsoft Sentinel can be improved in terms of automation or connecting with security products so that it is easier to use for general IT admins."

"We'd like to see more connectors."

"We are invoiced according to the amount of data generated within each log."

More Microsoft Sentinel cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is expensive."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is an expensive solution."

"Considering all the features of Fortinet FortiSOAR, I think it has a good price."

"The solution offers both licensing and subscription models that are similar in price to other products."

"If you compare Fortinet FortiSOAR's price with the prices of the market leader, Palo Alto, then it can be considered a cheaper product."

"Pricing is fine compared to other solutions."

"The price of the product should be lower. The brand value that Fortinet has, it has the reputation of being a reasonably priced product, and they have an enormous customer base in India. Most of the SME market is covered by FortiGate firewalls. It becomes an easy way for consultants, such as us, or even system integrators, to open the door with the Fortinet product lines."

"Since Africa is struggling with foreign exchange, the solution is pretty expensive there."

"It is certainly the most expensive solution. The cost is very high. We need to do an assessment using the one-month trial so that we can study the cost side. Before implementing it, we must do a careful calculation."

"The pricing is fair... With a traditional SIEM, you pay a lump sum for licenses. But with Sentinel, it's pay-as-you-go according to the amount of data you inject."

"It varies on a case-by-case basis. It is about $2,000 per month. The cost is very low in comparison to other SIEMs if you are already a Microsoft customer. If you are using the complete Microsoft stack, the cost reduces by almost 42% to 50%. Its cost depends on the number of logs and the type of subscription you have. You need to have an Azure subscription, and there are charges for log ingestion, and there are charges for the connectors."

"The price is reasonable because Sentinel includes features like user behavior analytics and SOAR that are typically sold separately. Overall, a standalone on-prem solution would require some high-end servers, and there's a different cost. It is a cloud-based solution, so there are backend cloud computing costs, but they are negligible."

"From a cost point of view, it is not a cheap product. It's, like, an enterprise-level application. So if you compare it with a low-level application, it's expensive, but if you compare it with the same-level application, it's pretty much cost-effective, I think."

"The pricing is reasonable, and we think Sentinel is worth what we pay for it."

"Sentinel is expensive relative to other products of the class, so it often isn't affordable for small-scale businesses. However, considering the solution has more extensive capabilities than others, the price is not so high. Pricing is based on GBs of ingested daily data, either by a pay-as-you-go or subscription model."

"It is priced fairly given the value that you get from the use of the product. The biggest mistake people make with Microsoft Sentinel is not understanding the pricing model and the amount of data that they are going to be running through the tool because you are paying based on the flow. You are paying based on the amount of data that is moving through the tool. People do not plan, and therefore, they get surprised by the cost associated with using the tool. They connect everything because they want to know everything, but connecting everything is very expensive."

More Microsoft Sentinel pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

What has not worked as well as I hoped with Torq is related to product data management and storing data, although it ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

My main use case for Torq is for managing IT services and providing faster response.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would rate Torq a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. I chose this rating because customer service is excellent. I suggest to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSOAR?

The product is expensive, but it is a value-for-money product. It is a good product to invest in, eventually securing...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSOAR?

Fortinet FortiSOAR has to be updated on the recent threats. Threats are changing, and it has to be updated to meet th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiSOAR?

I have been working in my field for almost four years, but right now I am not using it because my current company is ...

See all answers

Is there a common threat intelligence tool that aggregates multiple threat intelligence sources?

Yes, Azure Sentinel is a SIEM on the Cloud. Multiple data sources can be uploaded and analyzed with Azure Sentinel an...

See all answers

What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?

It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingest...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 9% of the time

D3 Security vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 16% of the time

Securonix SOAR vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 9% of the time

D3 Security vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Resilient vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiSOAR Competitors

AWS Security Hub vs Microsoft Sentinel

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM vs Microsoft Sentinel

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Sentinel

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Sentinel

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Sentinel Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

September 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR

October 2026

Download Fortinet FortiSOAR product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Sentinel

October 2026

Download Microsoft Sentinel product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberSponse, FortiSOAR

Azure Sentinel

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Fortinet FortiSOAR offers a comprehensive platform for automating and managing security operations. It streamlines cyber incident response and integrates with existing security systems for effective threat detection and remediation.

FortiSOAR is designed to enhance security operations through its automation capabilities and seamless platform integration. Its playbooks allow for quick response and efficient policy application, simplifying incident management and network security tasks. The centralized analytics and intuitive dashboards support threat intelligence management and workflow automation. Despite its benefits, FortiSOAR has areas for improvement, such as third-party integration, user-friendliness, and a high learning curve which affects playbook creation. Documentation and technical support need enhancement to facilitate better user experience, along with refining its pricing model and improving orchestration with network devices.

What are the top features of Fortinet FortiSOAR?

Playbooks: Enable rapid response and streamlined policy application.
Centralized Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights for effective threat management.
Automation Support: Simplifies incident management and network security tasks.
Integration: Offers seamless connectivity with diverse platforms via built-in connectors.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Facilitates intuitive navigation and display of essential data.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Human Error: Automates tasks like incident validation and IP blocking.
Enhanced Threat Intelligence: Improves security through SIEM compatibility and comprehensive monitoring.
Streamlined Workflows: Automates processes like ticket processing and system isolation.

Fortinet FortiSOAR is utilized across industries for its ability to manage security operations and case management efficiently. In sectors such as finance and healthcare, FortiSOAR automates responses to cyber threats, aiding in compliance and data protection. Its integration with security technologies supports robust threat intelligence, vital for sectors that process sensitive information.

Fortinet

Microsoft Sentinel offers cloud-native SIEM and SOAR capabilities with AI-powered threat detection, automated responses, and integration with Microsoft products. It is designed for comprehensive threat management with flexible deployment and scalability.

Microsoft Sentinel provides centralized management of cloud-based security monitoring and incident detection. Leveraging AI capabilities, it enhances threat intelligence and automation, allowing users to streamline security operations across cloud and on-premises systems. Microsoft Sentinel efficiently aggregates logs, correlates security events from multiple sources, and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft security offerings such as Defender. While its flexible deployment options and robust automation through playbooks are advantageous, users may encounter challenges with integration outside of Microsoft products, potential log ingestion delays, and a complex query language. The platform would benefit from enhanced speed, a simplified interface, improved query performance, and stronger documentation support.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Sentinel?

Cloud-native SIEM and SOAR: Enables security event management and orchestration in a cloud environment.
AI-powered threat detection: Utilizes artificial intelligence for identifying potential security threats.
Automated response playbooks: Automates routine responses to improve efficiency.
Data ingestion from multiple sources: Integrates with diverse data inputs for comprehensive visibility.
Integration with Microsoft products: Seamless collaboration with Microsoft security tools.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced threat visibility: Improves detection of security threats in various environments.
Reduced manual tasks: Automates processes to lessen human workload.
Scalable deployment: Offers flexibility for growing organizational requirements.
Centralized management: Simplifies oversight and management of threat detection and response.
Improved response times: Accelerates incident handling to minimize potential damage.

In specific industries, Microsoft Sentinel is utilized for its capability to monitor cloud-based workloads and detect incidents effectively. Users in healthcare, finance, and retail adopt it for its strong AI-driven threat detection and its ability to integrate with existing Microsoft solutions, ensuring high-level security operations and compliance with industry standards.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Sentinel is trusted by companies of all sizes including ABM, ASOS, Uniper, First West Credit Union, Avanade, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel

September 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.