Guardz vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Guardz and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Guardz is ranked #71, while Kaspersky is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Guardz holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Guardz users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and Guardz are cybersecurity solutions in the endpoint protection category. Guardz seems to hold an advantage due to its advanced features and seamless integrations, while Kaspersky is noted for its cost-effectiveness and robust support.

Features: Kaspersky provides advanced threat detection using machine learning and behavioral analysis. Its automated workflows aid in efficient incident response. Guardz features real-time threat intelligence and integrates seamlessly with security tools, making it suitable for dynamic environments that require constant adaptation. Despite Kaspersky's focus on automation and analytics, Guardz's features are more robust.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky offers straightforward deployment with a broad support network, ensuring a smooth setup with minimal downtime. Guardz's cloud-based model allows rapid implementation and centralized management, providing flexibility for resource-constrained firms, appealing to those prioritizing quick adaptation.

Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky offers competitive pricing with a focus on cost-effectiveness, often appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Its ROI is seen as resource-efficient. Guardz may have higher initial costs, but its ROI matches its advanced features and flexibility, appealing to those investing in future-proof security, despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Guardz is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Expert is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert	1.3%
Guardz	0.5%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Steve Bowtell

Managing Director at Cyber Active

Exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues

The solution's interface appears very simple, but it is very complicated in the back end. So, it removes all the complications that an MSP or an MSSP would normally have. The solution's maintenance depends on whether you run it like an MDR platform where you provide the detection response part for the customer. That would normally be the MSP part. Sometimes, you have customers who are just happy to get an email and tell them what the problem is, and they fix it themselves. If there's no in-house expertise, the MSP or the MSSP can do the maintenance. If there's in-house expertise, it's just a matter of advising them. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Ravi-Upadhyay

Founder at Inspira Enterprise

Provides strong threat detection and response through behavior analytics and network isolation

I have found the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert to be its ability to tackle the biggest challenges customers face when they have to mitigate any kind of a malware, ransomware attack, or online theft scenarios. The solution utilizes its HIPS, which is the host intrusion prevention system, behavior analytics system, and device control mechanism, making the antivirus capabilities of EDR quite strong. It is able to detect zero-day threats as well as historical or legacy malware, providing protection against current threats in the market and legacy malware. My opinion on the advanced threat detection algorithms in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is that the ATP functionality is quite strong because it utilizes the behavioral analytics engine in the backend, which employs machine learning mechanisms to identify any kind of vulnerability or exploit running on the operating system level and the network level. If an attack is about to happen on the endpoint, it is able to protect over the network as well and checks for any illegitimate encryption activities. The machine learning capability within Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has contributed to improving detection accuracy and reducing false positives in my environment by helping me identify malicious activity and differentiate between any malicious activity on the operating system level and on the network level. I have seen customers with in-house developed applications that have no public signatures available. Once I whitelist a particular application, it intelligently whitelists not only the executable but also all the dependent services required to run that application. Furthermore, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has successfully blocked network-level attacks on the endpoint. For example, during a recent DoS attack aimed at choking the entire network, Kaspersky detected the attack, isolated the device in a sandbox network, and alerted my SOC team via email for corrective action, thereby proactively helping me detect and protect devices from malicious attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One major outcome our organization achieved with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it is a good tool for analysis, remediation, and incident response, with no negative points in terms of budget and overall effectiveness."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"The most valuable features of this product are the management capabilities, which allow an IT organization to get quite a good picture of attempted cyber attacks, and its out-of-the-box investigation capabilities."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"What I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it is a comprehensive solution that contains everything the organization may need when using endpoints."

"The most valuable feature is that you can select remote access of any machine for sandboxing."

"The level of security I get for my endpoints and servers is extremely valuable."

"Since using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, our MTTR has reduced, which means the mean time to resolve any ticket has been reduced."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues."

"The most valuable feature is endpoint protection."

"Since we migrated to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response we have been protected very well."

"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."

"The most valuable feature is Endpoint's management."

"In my opinion Kaspersky is the best product on the market, it's very easy to handle, user-friendly and they provide a lot of features that are difficult to find in other endpoint solutions."

"The product is strong enough and capable of handling the type of detections as protection and security."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert provides excellent visibility into endpoint activities by giving a comprehensive log that includes all software and hardware inventory of the endpoint, shows the real-time processes running in memory, and also provides visibility on detected threats and the actions taken against them."

"The content filtering options are good."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pros

Cons

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"In some cases, there are too many options for me, and it is a bit too hard to find some settings which I really need to implement."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution's security awareness training and phishing are very United States-focused and don't work very well in Australia."

"Everything is automatic on Kaspersky but it would be great if they could add a feature for examining suspicious files."

"The technical support for this solution is not good. They do not have the availability of resources."

"It does not cover all of our security issues."

"We'd like to see them improve the automatic response."

"We would like to have better strategic information."

"Kaspersky EDR currently has limited OS support. They only focus on Windows Server and Windows."

"The license prices for this solution are quite high."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is very heavy on the system resources. It uses a lot of memory and the system can become slow."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet."

"The solution's cost is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"We have been satisfied with the license of the solution."

"Kaspersky's pricing is very competitive when it comes to comparison with the other solutions."

"EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year."

"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."

"The solution is worth its cost so I rate pricing a ten out of ten."

"The solution’s pricing is okay."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	48
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	56

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The price of the solution is economical.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The user interface of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert could be more intuitive, and I would appreciat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

My usual use cases for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involve detecting ransomware earlier and proa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Coro vs Guardz

Compared 17% of the time

Avanan vs Guardz

Compared 16% of the time

Cynet vs Guardz

Compared 9% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Guardz

Compared 9% of the time

Huntress Managed ITDR vs Guardz

Compared 6% of the time

More Guardz Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 4% of the time

OPTIMUS EDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 4% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 2% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

September 2026

Download Guardz product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

October 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Expert product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Kaspersky EDR

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Guardz delivers robust cybersecurity solutions tailored for businesses seeking reliable and efficient security measures without compromise.

Guardz is specifically designed for businesses looking for dependable digital protection. It integrates advanced threat detection and prevention technologies, ensuring improved cyber resilience. Guardz is a preferable choice for organizations of all sizes, offering a comprehensive security suite that addresses potential vulnerabilities and enhances data protection efficiently.

What are Guardz's most valuable features?

Adaptive Threat Detection: Continuously monitors and identifies emerging threats, adapting to new challenges in real-time.
Data Encryption: Offers strong encryption to protect sensitive data against unauthorized access.
Access Control: Provides multi-layered access control mechanisms to ensure only authorized personnel can access critical systems.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Users will notice an immediate improvement in their comprehensive security management.
Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operational costs through efficient threat management and proactive maintenance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs without a significant increase in expenditure.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Guardz is implemented to counter sophisticated attacks, protecting client data and maintaining regulatory compliance. Retail sectors use Guardz to secure online transactions, ensuring customer data remains protected from breaches and fraud.

Guardz

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a robust cybersecurity tool that delivers protection against cyberthreats while enhancing visibility and response capabilities for IT security teams.

This comprehensive solution integrates with Endpoint Protection Platform to block and detect cyberthreats while providing tools for IT security professionals. Backed by 30 years of experience, it is trusted by over 600 enterprise customers, safeguarding more than 2.5 million endpoints across the globe. The system is built with a powerful set of detection engines, enabling proactive threat investigation with clear visualization. It features an open architecture supporting broad integration capabilities, making it versatile for diverse IT environments.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses machine learning and behavior analytics to identify sophisticated threats.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Provides robust security measures, including intrusion prevention and firewall capabilities.
Open Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Kaspersky SIEM, Endpoint Security, and third-party workflows.
Embedded Sandbox: Analyzes suspicious files in depth to determine threat levels.
Centralized Management: Facilitates encryption and reporting for enhanced usability.

What benefits can users expect when using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Effective Security: Offers reliable protection against malware and ransomware.
Scalability: Designed to support expanding infrastructures.
Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with centralized control.
Responsive Support: Provides swift assistance for technical issues.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and corporate IT, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is employed for network and endpoint security, shielding against malware, zero-day threats, and unauthorized access. It empowers these sectors with enhanced threat intelligence, secure data protection, and effective patch management, facilitating robust protection across diverse ecosystems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.