No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Imperva Data Security Fabric vs Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 21, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Container Security (8th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (7th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (6th)
Imperva Data Security Fabric
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Database Security (2nd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (14th), Data Security Platforms (DSP) (6th)
Proofpoint Data Security Po...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (16th), Data Security Platforms (DSP) (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2859021 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Risk-based triage has transformed container security and now prioritizes high-impact threats
The best features Qualys TotalCloud offers currently include managing cloud infrastructure and container security while facing major challenges such as alert fatigue. Traditional vulnerability scanners flag hundreds of CVEs on short-lived Kubernetes containers, some of which have no internet exposure or are gone before we can even triage them. I leverage Qualys TotalCloud to move beyond static CVSS. I use it to implement runtime exposure, correlation risk reprioritization, and shift-left integration. This notifies developers to fix a base image upstream rather than patching live ephemeral instances. In my work with cloud and container security, the biggest operational hurdle was alert fatigue. I use Qualys to shift left from static CVSS severity to context-aware risk prioritization. I correlated raw vulnerability data with real-time risk factors such as public network exposure, active runtime execution, or overly permissive IAM roles. This allows us to immediately drop the priority of isolated containers and escalate lower-severity CVEs that sit on an exposed, high-risk path. We can map these findings directly back to our CI/CD pipelines so developers can patch the root base images upstream. We have drastically cut down the signal-to-noise ratio, saved a lot of manual hours doing triage work, and ensured engineering effort goes directly towards high-impact risk reduction.
GO
Group Head of Information Security at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Automated monitoring and real-time alerts improve security incident response and compliance tasks while customizable controls need enhancements
The Imperva SecureSphere Database Security offers excellent functionalities, with numerous best features from my perspective.The simplicity of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security comes out of the box. I have utilized the detailed audit logs feature in the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, and it has proven to be highly effective. The Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has significantly aided my organization in forensic investigations and compliance audits. The real-time alerts and remediation actions available in Imperva SecureSphere Database Security have helped me promptly address security incidents. Their customizable security controls in Imperva SecureSphere Database Security have tailored the protection level for my organization's specific needs. The automated monitoring and reporting features of the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security have contributed to simplifying compliance with regulatory standards for my organization.
EO
Senior Solutions Architect at Cyber Knight Technologies FZ LLC
AI classification has transformed data visibility and now simplifies policy‑driven protection
In my opinion, what should be improved about Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management is that it is quite advanced. I think they should ease it up a bit. When it comes to setting of policies, I wish there were a single policy that deals with multiple channels of exfiltration instead of having to do multiple policies to deal with maybe data exfiltration through web upload, data exfiltration through USB, data exfiltration through print, copy and paste, and so forth. It would have been much easier if I had one policy, and then I could turn on the light for all of these different exfiltration channels. A critical example is saying I want to put up a PII policy that will secure social security numbers. That is the condition, social security number. Then in the same policy, I should be able to state that I want this to block exfiltration through USB. However, I want it to allow uploads through web or uploads to a particular website or URL. I want it to allow that kind of granularity where you can flick around things on the same policy. Currently, with Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management, you have to build multiple policies for different channels. Most importantly, the Boolean logic in their policies is incomplete. It just has the AND function. Boolean should carry AND and OR. I am saying if this data contains PII data OR PCI data—either of them—it flags either PCI or PII. But what it has now is AND. For it to fire or trigger, both must be triggered. So if somebody puts only one, maybe PII, and does not put PCI, then it does not trigger. It should have an OR, so that I can have multiple policies and then differentiate them so that if this OR this OR this, either of these triggers. I have flagged that and raised that as a concern to the product team. I expect additional features from them in the next release, specifically the OR feature for the conditions. However, I am happy with the agent, the lightweight agent, the amount of activities it captures. Beyond just the DLP, it looks at the sites and URLs you are going to, it looks at the file renaming, it looks at the attempt to uninstall, and it looks really deep even though it is user mode. I am happy with that. The Boolean logic is what I think is incomplete at the moment.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the features I appreciate is the ability to generate daily reports without relying on anyone else."
"The agent and agentless scanning in TotalCloud, particularly the FlexScan method, is incredibly valuable. With traditional scanning approaches, we had to give IP ranges and whitelist IPs. All that is now simplified. FlexScan requires minimal intervention, and after configuration, it automatically collects data and performs necessary scans."
"With TotalCloud, we can scan through the API. If we are not able to deploy cloud agents on the machine, we can use the API."
"I would definitely recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other customers."
"The most valuable feature is the consolidated information that it provides from various platforms."
"One of Qualys' best features is its categorization, which allows us to see the types of assets, their security postures, and the AI-powered version of the tool."
"Qualys TotalCloud fulfills all these needs."
"TotalCloud provides the easiest and the best approach for cloud infrastructure management."
"Excellent ROI using the automated scans, especially comparing it to the manual method proposed by many vendors."
"The benefits are operational. The outcome comes from preventing an attack on the organization. On the operational side, you generally have good, decent security measures for your application, database, and digital assets."
"Flexible reporting allows for customization that keeps the admins from having to interact with system automation."
"The best features of Imperva Data Security are that it's a complete solution and it safeguards company reputation."
"Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is both completely scalable and stable."
"SecureSphere fulfills so many requirements for our clients."
"If something malicious occurs, I can set a policy to block it, review the action, and decide whether to release it if it's found not to be malicious."
"The most valuable features of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are the user-friendliness, easy-to-use interface compared to competitors, database operations do not need a specialist, and simple to manage for our security team. Additionally, the solution can show all the databases and the level of sensitivity. It can show what is more sensitive or less sensitive."
"It has helped my data security strategy very well because one thing is to set static DLP rules, however, how do you start setting rules when you have little or zero visibility as to where your critical or sensitive data resides?"
 

Cons

"Their customer support needs improvement."
"In terms of improvement, remediation still belongs to the cloud team, which is one of the issues we faced with Qualys TotalCloud."
"One of the things that could be improved is the alerts. Qualys is a fantastic tool, especially with the TruRisk feature, but one challenge that most leaders face involves alert fatigue."
"The vulnerability part is good, but the policy compliance module needs improvement because it involves a lot of manual work. Specifically, the remediation part of the controls requires enhancements."
"The support is not up to the mark and seems to be overburdened."
"I didn't give it a ten because I would like to see simpler configuration, more customizable dashboards, and better automation and integration options."
"It is already perfect, but they can bring some newer dashboards and customization options for the dashboard. It would be great to be able to include on-prem assets on the dashboard."
"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations. This shortcoming means we must rely on SCCM when any service stack updates or additional prerequisites are needed."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"The professional services and customer training aspect needs to be improved."
"The development mode on the platform needs improvement. For example, the archiving functionalities should be enhanced to allow easy conversion of archived logs into CSV or Excel formats for data analysis."
"I would like to see integration such that there is support for different kinds of environments, such as on-premises versus cloud."
"Imperva Data Security needs to improve first-level support."
"The product is under high development and the amount of bugs is bit disappointing."
"What I would like to see improved is Imperva making further development in terms of them going to the Cloud."
"It can be simplified as it is a little complicated."
"In my opinion, what should be improved about Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management is that it is quite advanced."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable. It helps us to manage things with very few resources."
"TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be."
"I am not sure about the pricing. From what I understand, it is a bit on the higher side, but I do not have the exact numbers."
"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."
"Its price seems higher compared to other tools, but it is worth it. If they could adjust the pricing and make it comparable with other tools, that would be great."
"Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility."
"Qualys TotalCloud offers competitive pricing given its comprehensive suite of features, including integration, assessment, remediation, and detection capabilities, all within a single platform."
"The pricing is comparable. It is built into our other product, so I cannot piecemeal it. It is a part of our subscription."
"The price is very high but compared to the price of the overall solution, then I think it's a good deal because the solution itself is great."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and it requires a license."
"Its pricing could be cheaper for the African countries or developing economies. The British pound is valued way more than the currency of most African countries. A better or cheaper pricing model for Nigerian and African customers would be better. It has a per-year subscription model. You pay exactly for what you need. That's all. You don't have to buy what you don't need."
"We have all the licenses, which we pay for annually. The price is a little high, but the product is good."
"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and it is a good value for the money."
"The product is expensive."
"This is an expensive solution and the price should be reduced."
"The pricing is reasonably good in South Africa."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
18%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Construction Company
7%
Media Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise39
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise32
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?
We purchased Qualys TotalCloud for GCP and Azure as well. It is comparatively better than others regarding pricing. T...
What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?
I am unsure about how Qualys TotalCloud can be improved. I do not have anything else to add about the needed improvem...
What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?
My main use case for Qualys TotalCloud is telemetry, although I am unsure about the specifics. A quick specific examp...
How does IBM Guardium Data Protection compare with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, co...
What needs improvement with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?
There are several aspects of the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security that could be improved or enhanced.There are ...
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management?
In my opinion, what should be improved about Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management is that it is quite advanced...
What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management?
I have been dealing with Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management as a distributor. If you are speaking on the Pro...
What advice do you have for others considering Proofpoint Data Security Posture Management?
It has improved my compliance efforts absolutely because first and foremost, with the classification, it guides users...
 

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, jSonar, Imperva's Data Security Posture Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Varonis, Orca Security and others in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM). Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.