Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway vs Skyhigh Security comparison

Kaspersky Security for Inte...

Read 72 Skyhigh Security reviews

10,559 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Skyhigh Security and Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway compete in the cloud service and internet gateway security markets, respectively. Based on the comparison, Skyhigh Security appears to have an upper hand for cloud-focused environments with its extensive cloud service features.

Features: Skyhigh Security provides valuable features such as shadow IT identification, risk assessment, and DLP integration, offering in-depth cloud service visibility and data protection. Its strong cloud registry allows monitoring and detailed risk insights. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway focuses on antivirus and content filtering, delivering solid threat protection with a user-friendly management interface.

Room for Improvement: Skyhigh Security needs to address console performance issues, report generation delays, and cumbersome custom field updates. Enhancements in UI and integration with unsanctioned applications are necessary. Kaspersky Security's improvement areas include better customer support responsiveness, mobile capabilities, and competitive pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skyhigh Security offers flexible deployment options including hybrid, on-premises, and public cloud, catering to diverse infrastructures. Its customer service experiences vary, with some users reporting excellent support while others experience delays. Kaspersky Security is primarily deployed on-premises and generally receives positive feedback for support effectiveness, though occasional response lags are noted.

Pricing and ROI: Skyhigh Security's pricing is determined by monitored users and API integrations, perceived as expensive but cost-efficient by some. Kaspersky Security's licensing is seen as costly, especially when extensively scaled, but justified by its features. Both are considered investments for improved security rather than direct financial returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Security for Inte...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (30th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (30th), Anti-Malware Tools (37th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Skyhigh Security

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (7th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (14th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (7th), ZTNA as a Service (10th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is designed for Secure Email Gateway (SEG) and holds a mindshare of 1.1%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
Skyhigh Security, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), holds 2.5% mindshare, up 1.7% since last year.

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway	1.1%
Proofpoint Email Protection	17.7%
Mimecast Advanced Email Security	14.1%
Other	67.1%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Skyhigh Security	2.5%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	10.1%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	8.7%
Other	78.7%

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2736225

Program Manager at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Effective threat protection with room for cost and usability improvements

There are some drawbacks that I would mention. To be frank, enterprises always look for cost benefits, so Kaspersky could implement some price benefits. Additionally, regarding know-how, if I am an experienced person it's fine, but when someone novice is working with it, they need information about why certain actions are required. Security is a field that is very vast, and implications are not known to everyone. In future updates, a quick walk-through and know-how features would be beneficial, such as information text at relevant places. This will increase usability. Feature-wise, an impact analysis would be a really good addition.

Read full review

DeepakGupta_

Deputy Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud security has improved DLP incident management and simplifies email protection

One major challenge is that downloading incidents during the investigation process takes a very long time, and this issue should be resolved. More customized columns and filtering options in incident review would be beneficial. File types should be included, such as file names along with file extensions, which are not currently available to my knowledge. Overall, Skyhigh Security is very good and just needs to improve in terms of the latency of downloading incidents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to threat detection, it is very strict with file downloads and uploads. It sends reports and quarantines suspicious files."

"The password thing is very good, and the overall URL protection."

"The most valuable aspect for me is the user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the antivirus and child protection features."

"I would recommend it to others as it's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is the antivirus."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its ease of use and operation efficiency."

"Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway has positively impacted our organization by helping us control unwanted attacks and limiting our exposure to risks."

"Offers a very strong URL spam filtering feature."

"Skyhigh Security is a good product that is very easy to integrate with any tools, and the dashboards are user-friendly and easy to understand."

"The support is excellent."

"Skyhigh Security has positively impacted my organization; before using it, we needed to monitor cloud applications including Office 365 and other applications such as Facebook manually, and after we started using Skyhigh Security, through the dashboard, we are able to control user monitoring, access control, and everything else effectively."

"Improves creation of security alerts on web proxy logs by having a separate system interpret said logs."

"The stability is the most valuable feature; we haven't had any issues with the product and it's easy to configure and manage day to day."

"It's a great product with solid features."

"The solution performs well."

More Skyhigh Security pros

Cons

"The customer support of the product is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."

"It might be helpful to have notifications on mobile devices, especially if the same browser profile is used on both mobile and laptop."

"In different locations, they're priced differently, but that's mainly marketing rather than the product features."

"I believe the absence of a procedure is the main issue."

"When I do a configuration, I do not know what implication it will have downstream."

"The initial setup of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway is complex. The full deployment took approximately two weeks."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the pricing."

"The encrypted disk implementation could be improved."

"One area for improvement I've seen in Skyhigh Security is that it lacks support for unsanctioned applications, where customers have their applications. Those applications do not come from Microsoft or other popular vendors. For example, Microsoft has support for Teams and it has support for OneDrive, but it doesn't have support for custom applications built by customers. Customers have internal teams building and publishing applications to the external world, but Skyhigh Security doesn't have support for those applications, and this is the main problem I've seen. The solution only supports a pool of applications that are from Microsoft and other major SaaS vendors. McAfee doesn't provide support for custom applications, compared to other vendors who provide it. For example, Bitglass and Netskope both have support for custom applications. Another area for improvement in Skyhigh Security is that its API support is a little weak. I also have not seen a strong integration between the solution and other McAfee products."

"I have experienced a few cases where I provided a direct contact name (who was expecting a call from someone at Skyhigh) for the cloud service provider being evaluated, and have received feedback from the contact that no one reached out to them after several days or, in some cases, weeks."

"Its initial setup could be more straightforward."

"The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities."

"De-tokenization."

"The cloud capability needs to be improved in terms of scalability. More generally, both scalability and performance on the cloud need to be improved."

"It is an expensive solution."

More Skyhigh Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am okay with the pricing."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"The cost is relatively high, and as a licensed product, there are restrictions on the number of users permitted per license."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being very expensive and one being cheap. It's neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"Personal computer licenses can be expensive if you were to scale the solution extensively. However, large companies will most likely use Endpoint solutions and not this one."

"It is expensive."

"This is an expensive product, although it is made for larger enterprises and not for small organizations."

"The solution's hardware is expensive."

"There is a license required to use this solution and it is paid annually. The price is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is good and we pay an annual license."

"Pricing is not out of reach."

"Some of our clients have a perpetual license and pay additional support yearly."

"Have a risk-based approach towards pricing."

"Pricing for Skyhigh Security is okay, though there's always a scope for price improvements. Its pricing is okay compared to other products because other products have very expensive licensing costs. Along with the licensing, support is also provided for Skyhigh Security, so pricing is reasonable, but if there's proactive or better support, that will justify the pricing. I haven't interacted with the Skyhigh Security technical support team yet, so I'd give pricing a four out of five rating for now."

More Skyhigh Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	34
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

Regarding pricing, I'll be exactly on the brink, neither for it nor against it because being a small company, it's a slightly pricey solution. However, considering the advantages they bring, we are...

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

We work with a cloud solution. The product that we use is developed as a SaaS model. In this case, we work with AWS as our cloud provider. We use a public cloud. The tool is good, but they need to ...

What advice do you have for others considering Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

That's a very generic feedback. I would not have much information about threat intelligence metrics through Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway because I've not been monitoring it for quite som...

What needs improvement with McAfee Web Gateway?

From my perspective as a distributor and based on feedback from my clients, Skyhigh Security has a bit of a disadvantage in the Philippines. First, Skyhigh Security is not offering the full SASE su...

What is your primary use case for McAfee Web Gateway?

I do not use Skyhigh Security firsthand, but M.Tech Philippines distributes Skyhigh Security as one of the authorized distributors. My main use case for Skyhigh Security in my role as a distributor...

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Web Gateway?

I always believe that Skyhigh Security works hand-in-hand with Trellix. What we are doing in our approach is to deliver the whole use case from an end-to-end approach, and from on-premises to cloud...

IPRoyal vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Trellix Collaboration Security vs Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint ONE vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Skyhigh Security Competitors

Product Reports

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway

October 2026

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway report

Download Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway product report

Download Skyhigh Security product report

September 2026

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Cloud, McAfee MVISION Unified Cloud Edge, McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee MVISION CNAPP, and Skyhigh Networks, McAfee Web Gateway

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Kaspersky

Overview

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway ensures comprehensive cybersecurity with real-time threat detection, antivirus protection, and a user-friendly interface. It enhances network security with frequent updates and efficient management tools, making it ideal for protecting organizational digital environments.

Focused on safeguarding against hacking tools, phishing, and viruses, Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway supports network security by ensuring safe browsing and email protection. It's ideal for multiple devices, enhancing cybersecurity through secure communication, document protection, and encryption for cloud-based operations. Its features include an advanced management console, spyware protection, and traffic monitoring, tailored for ease of use and effective defense. Implementation requires minimal effort, thanks to the expertise of Kaspersky specialists.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

Antivirus Protection: Defends against various malware threats, ensuring network safety.
Real-time Threat Detection: Constantly monitors for potential attacks, providing instant alerts.
Firewall and Advanced Spyware Protection: Offers multilayered security against spyware and unauthorized access.
Management Console: Centralizes control over security settings and updates for easy management.
Traffic Monitoring: Tracks network traffic to identify and mitigate potential threats.
Parental Controls: Allows safe browsing environments for home networks.

What benefits should reviews highlight about Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway?

Ease of Use: User-friendly design ensures quick adaptation and efficient security management.
Effective Threat Mitigation: Frequent updates and advanced features rapidly address emerging threats.
Security Enhancements: Password and URL protection improve overall cybersecurity posture.
Expert Implementation: Streamlined setup reduces time and resource investment in deployment.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, implementing Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateway provides robust defenses against cyber threats. Organizations benefit from secure communication channels, data protection measures, and compliance with industry regulations, enhancing trust and safety across digital operations.

Kaspersky

Skyhigh Security provides comprehensive protection with features like user behavior analytics, shadow IT identification, and data loss prevention. Its integration with IT infrastructure offers robust security insights and helps maintain compliance.

Skyhigh Security offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation while delivering substantial threat protection. It enhances existing IT infrastructure integration, such as DLP and Active Directory, to strengthen security. Yet, there is room for improvement in report generation speed, interface intuitiveness, and integration with other products. Organizations utilize Skyhigh Security to audit internet behavior, secure cloud environments and control web content. It effectively manages data movement and ensures compliance, while preventing unauthorized access and bandwidth misuse.

What are the key features of Skyhigh Security?

Shadow IT Identification: Detects unauthorized IT activity to maintain security.
Cloud Service Risk Assessments: Offers detailed evaluations of cloud services' risks.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or deliberate data breaches.
User Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user actions for potential security threats.
Security Insights: Provides comprehensive reports to understand security posture.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Threat Protection: Offers robust measures against potential security risks.
Compliance: Assists with industry regulations and standards adherence.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances protection by integrating with existing infrastructure.
User Experience: Easy navigation despite needing interface improvements.
Cloud Security: Secures cloud environments effectively.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, companies implement Skyhigh Security for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. It helps secure access to SaaS applications and protects against threats, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and preventing data breaches while optimizing performance in cloud environments.

Sample Customers

Tael, Insolar, Goods.ru, Republic of Serbia

Western Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.