Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #49. Microsoft holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft DPM

Read 21 Microsoft DPM reviews

4,324 Views
3,935 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

7,980 Views
7,342 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft DPM

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft DPM and OpenText Data Protector are direct competitors in the data protection space. While Microsoft DPM is favored for its integration with Microsoft's suite, OpenText Data Protector offers advanced features for robust data management.

Features: Microsoft DPM is valued for integration with Microsoft technologies, efficient backup for Windows servers, and reliance on Azure for cloud-based services. It provides seamless backup and restore for Microsoft environments, excellent integration with System Center, and supports online backups. OpenText Data Protector excels in data scalability, cross-platform compatibility, and integration with various operating systems and applications. It supports SAP/Oracle backups, has a flexible and intuitive user interface, and provides reliable disaster recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft DPM could enhance its support for non-Microsoft platforms, improve reliability with fewer update issues, and offer better performance consistency. OpenText Data Protector might benefit from a simplified deployment process, improved integration with cloud services, and enhanced data backup speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft DPM is noted for straightforward deployment in Microsoft-centric infrastructures with minimal guidance due to its intuitive nature. OpenText Data Protector involves a more complex deployment process but offers comprehensive documentation and support to aid clients. Microsoft users find rapid setup, while OpenText provides expansive support for intricate deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft DPM traditionally offers a lower initial setup cost, particularly attractive to businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing ROI through reduced integration expenses. OpenText Data Protector, despite higher upfront costs, often justifies its expense with extensive functionality and long-term scalability, beneficial for enterprises requiring advanced data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft DPM

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

37th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

49th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Microsoft DPM is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft DPM	0.9%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Nirukshitha Gamage

Senior Manager - System Infrastructure Software Support Team at DMS Electronics (Pvt) Ltd

User finds setup straightforward but seeks wider platform support and advanced features

Microsoft DPM could implement backup capabilities for third-party systems such as Linux. They also need to consider other features such as replication to DR sites, similar to what Veeam and other products offer. Microsoft DPM didn't have that capability at that time. If they want to remain competitive in the market, they need to observe the competition and implement improvements. The backup should have compression, deduplication, and DR replication. They should also improve monitoring of the environment. Microsoft DPM didn't have these basics at that time. If they had continued development on the products, they could have reached a higher level, especially given Microsoft's significant presence and majority of servers. Microsoft DPM didn't have any support structure in the backend. If they had a support structure, we could have escalated issues. I never received any support from Microsoft DPM.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I found Microsoft DPM pretty useful as it satisfied most of my requirements and seems to be fulfilling all the requirements for our backup strategy."

"Microsoft support for this product is very good."

"Microsoft DPM's is easy to set up."

"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."

"The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched."

"One of the most effective features of Microsoft DPM is its integration with the entire Microsoft ecosystem."

"The solution really does great recovery."

"The most valuable feature is the total integration of the System Center solution."

More Microsoft DPM pros

"Data Protector is very good at automation; from the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good, and I don't need to touch it because it will do it by itself."

"Since we implemented the new PostgreSQL database, Data Protector's stability has greatly improved."

"It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore."

"Overall, when compared with other restore solutions, I can say most of the good features are packed inside a software that has a small footprint."

"I've used the product for a long time and am very familiar with all its features."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."

"It is really easy to backup and restore your data across all servers, something that IBM Spectrum Protect struggles to do."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"It needs portability for other vendors. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers, but it doesn't support third-party solutions such as Oracle Database. It depends on Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy, especially for Hyper-V, which has a lot of problems. They should enhance the Volume Shadow Copy functionality. Its reporting should also be better. Reporting is too weak in DPM."

"The DPM is pretty good, but when it comes to external devices, you can't back up to the external device."

"The stability in Microsoft DPM 2015 was better than the 2019 version; we have had some problems."

"The user friendliness could be improved."

"Overall, I wouldn't describe the solution as user-friendly. It's not very intuitive."

"Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great."

"Optimization of fabric administrator cause management problem to arise in backup administrator as it leads to the backup software failure in a manner that cannot be foreseen or anticipated finding backup administrators unawares."

"Recent minor upgrade required a reboot of all of my protected 2008 servers. This I considered unacceptable as I had to reschedule an outage window to reboot 100+ servers."

More Microsoft DPM cons

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"Every time there is a backup running, I cannot predict anything, so I cannot say if it will back up the first time."

"We face challenges with its stability."

"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."

"Customer Service: It's not good and needs to be improved. Technical Support: It's not good and needs to be improved."

"Other tools seem to be easier to use."

"There have been some issues."

"I really wouldn't recommend others to use this solution - especially when it comes to the technical support."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support."

"Microsoft DPM can be considered as an expensive solution for smaller or medium enterprises, but we have been satisfied with the price structure as it is fixed and it offers a variety of useful features"

"Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft DPM?

The pricing of Microsoft solutions rates in the middle range at five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities. AI integration is not necessary for backups as this is not a security solution.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft DPM?

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

Catalogic DPX vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft DPM Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

VM Explorer vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM

October 2026

Download Microsoft DPM product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Microsoft DPM is a comprehensive backup and recovery software that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, providing efficient recovery capabilities and ensuring compatibility across workloads.

Microsoft's Data Protection Manager offers significant integration capabilities with Microsoft applications and Azure Active Directory for Single Sign-On, enhancing scalability through integration with System Center. It supports streamlined backup solutions for both physical and virtual Microsoft environments, with automated operations and a user-friendly interface. While DPM showcases robust file search capabilities, time-saving functionalities, and enhanced security measures, improvements are needed in third-party integrations, backup for external devices, and affordable cloud storage options. Enterprises might face challenges due to complex configurations and limited user-community support.

What are the key features of Microsoft DPM?

Seamless integration with Microsoft Apps: Provides straightforward integration for enhanced operational efficiency.
Efficient Recovery Capabilities: Enables quick data restoration to minimize downtime.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Facilitates Single Sign-On for easier access control.
Compatibility with System Center: Enhances scalability and management efficiency.
Automated Operations: Streamlines backup processes, reducing manual effort.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Strong file search capabilities contribute to data protection.
Time-Saving: Quick recovery processes improve operational efficiency.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies backup management for IT teams.

In industries such as consulting, local government, and data centers, Microsoft DPM plays a critical role in managing backup and recovery operations. Organizations rely on it to safeguard environments, including ERP systems and virtual machines, by supporting daily, weekly, and incremental backups, disaster recovery, and data replication across physical Windows Servers, Hyper-V Servers, SharePoint, and more.

Microsoft

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.