No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Teams vs Sendbird comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Microsoft Teams enhanced communication, saved commuting costs, and boosted productivity, despite varied opinions on its investment value.
Sentiment score
6.1
Sendbird boosts efficiency by automating tasks, reducing development time, and enhancing user engagement, highlighting its substantial business value.
I have seen a return on investment from using Microsoft Teams.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I have seen a return on investment with Microsoft Teams, as it definitely increases productivity and saves time.
Sr. Quality Analyst at Appinventiv
When I switched to Microsoft Teams, it became faster for everyone in my organization, helping improve the quality of delivery, save time, and reduce costs, making my organization more competitive in the market.
QA Lead at Trelleborg
The main return was not something of direct cost tracking on my own side, but more on the time saved, the faster response, and the reduced pressure on agents.
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I have seen a return on investment, including saved money, saved time, and the requirement of very few resources or employees to implement Sendbird chat.
Senior Software Professional at Merkle INC
It allowed us to focus on validating business workflows and user experience instead of troubleshooting core messaging functionality.
Software Engineer in Test at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Microsoft Teams support is reliable for large enterprises but sometimes slow for small businesses, with 24/7 and premium options available.
Sentiment score
5.4
Sendbird's support is responsive and helpful, though less effective with complex issues across multiple SDKs, valued for weekly visits.
Microsoft Teams is one hundred percent stable.
QA Lead at Trelleborg
Microsoft support is excellent, offering instantaneous assistance through either robo support or live personnel.
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited
We have cases where it took more than six months to resolve very basic issues.
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
The resolution to some problems that involved multiple SDKs came in a little later and required a lot of effort from my end to get the solution out.
Vice President, Technology (Mobile Architecture & Platform Lead) at Playfora
The team was responsive and helpful in addressing technical questions.
Software Engineer in Test at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Customer support is great; whenever I require support from Sendbird team, I receive a response within 24 hours.
Senior Software Professional at Merkle INC
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Teams efficiently supports large user volumes, integrates well with tools, and suits companies of all sizes despite channel limitations.
Sentiment score
6.2
Sendbird ensures seamless, large-scale user engagement with robust performance, overcoming documentation challenges through persistence and efficiently handling concurrent users.
We have around thousands of employees in my project using it simultaneously and it is working smoothly.
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution.
Master in Cyber Security at Ganpat University
Microsoft Teams can be scalable for more than 1,000 people, and I have seen video conferences with 5,000 participants, so the scale is incredible.
Senior Software Engineer at Endava
It has very good connection management which helps a large number of concurrent users to connect and use the chatbot and also helps to maintain traffic spikes.
Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Chats still came in real time, and agents could manage multiple conversations without the system slowing down.
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The scalability is quite effective.
Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Teams is highly rated for stability, with rare issues linked to connectivity and improvements noted in updates.
Sentiment score
7.0
Sendbird maintains stable, efficient real-time messaging with minor issues, reliable support, and highly rated chatbot performance.
I appreciate the ability of Microsoft Teams to control the quality of the call.
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
The kind of issue is that it always asks for the password, and I think for Citrix or for a shared platform, it is not really easy to manage, and it is not stable.
IT Director at ATOS
In my experience, Microsoft Teams is stable.
System Administrator at Interswitch
Conversations loaded properly, messages delivered in real time, and the system generally stayed responsive even when chat volumes increased significantly.
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The chatbot availability is approximately 99% and even if some services are down, it does not affect the chatbot availability.
Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Sendbird was a stable and reliable platform throughout my experience.
Software Engineer in Test at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Teams needs better stability, memory use, AI integration, and smoother cross-platform functionality with enhanced file sharing and interface.
Sendbird must enhance documentation, stability, pricing, features, analytics, and updates while refining SDKs for better integration across platforms.
AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support.
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations.
Microsoft Practice Lead at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail.
Team Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
With AI-driven development happening, I would say include more AI-driven development or include more options on different libraries and languages.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
More flexibility in configuring unread count behavior, along with clearer documentation and debugging tools for these scenarios, would make it easier for developers and QA teams to validate and troubleshoot messaging workflows.
Software Engineer in Test at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The documentation for integrating with the Flutter framework is lacking detailed information.
Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Teams' pricing is flexible and varies widely; it offers economical bundles but can be costly with advanced features.
Enterprise users find Sendbird's pricing high, with various plans and occasional discounts, deterring some from committing before completion.
Microsoft Teams is economical when purchased as part of an Office 365 bundle.
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack.
Microsoft Practice Lead at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Regarding the license, the Microsoft 365 license I am taking is quite expensive, and every year it goes higher.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
overall it is an expensive product as compared to other peers
Vice President, Technology (Mobile Architecture & Platform Lead) at Playfora
The subscription cost is quite high, which prevents us from subscribing before the project completion and user testing.
Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited
Compared to other chat providers, Sendbird is not that expensive to integrate.
Senior Software Professional at Merkle INC
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Teams enhances productivity and collaboration with AI features, seamless integrations, and user-friendly tools for global communication.
Sendbird delivers scalable chat solutions with real-time messaging, metadata, and seamless integration to enhance user engagement and operations.
Teams offers the ability to record sessions and store them in OneDrive, which provides 1 terabyte of space.
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited
The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.
Team Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The biggest advantage of Microsoft Teams is that it is a combined package where I can do chat, video conferencing, work on spreadsheets, documents, and other things with many people sitting at my desk, which makes work easy, especially with clients who are in remote locations, so it saves a lot of time.
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates
Features similar to WhatsApp, such as online and offline statuses, message reactions, and replies, add significant value.
Junior Software Developer at Weavers Web Solutions Private Limited
On average, I save two weeks per project compared to building custom chatbots.
Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Having the full history in one place makes a very big difference because agents can quickly understand what has already happened and continue helping customers without making them repeat themselves.
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
181
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
Sendbird
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (7th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (2nd), AI Customer Support (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 6.8%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sendbird is 2.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams6.8%
Sendbird2.1%
Other91.1%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ayush Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Collaboration has transformed daily work and supports seamless global voice communication
Microsoft Teams could be improved, especially regarding contact center solutions which have a growing need for omnichannel capabilities, integrating with external platforms such as social media and email for a unified experience. Minor improvements might include reintroducing features such as GPU options available in classic Microsoft Teams to address issues in modern Microsoft Teams related to video meetings and content sharing. Furthermore, essential information such as who started or ended recordings should be more accessible in the Microsoft Teams admin center. I rate it a nine because Microsoft Teams occasionally experiences glitches in the client, leading to missing chat history or other transient issues. The performance issues with the desktop client and the support service complexities contribute to my rating being less than perfect. I have not identified any other improvements needed for Microsoft Teams.
Shadrach Godwish Chukwu - PeerSpot reviewer
SDR and Workflow Automation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Organized real-time customer chats have improved support efficiency and response handling
One thing I found unique about Sendbird is how smooth the real-time chat feels. It does not feel delayed or clunky. Conversations flow naturally, as though you are talking to someone in real time. If I could improve one thing, I would add more built-in analytics around conversations, such as clearer insights on response times, common issues, and agent performance. That would make it much easier to optimize support without relying on external tools. One improvement I see for Sendbird would be more flexibility in customizing the chat interface, especially around how conversations are displayed for agents. Sometimes, when handling multiple chats, having better layout controls or quick filters would make it much easier to stay organized. I also would appreciate more built-in analytics inside the platform itself, such as clearer breakdowns of response times, chat resolution rates, and common customer issues. Right now, you often need external tools to get that level of insights. Overall, it works very well, but those improvements would make the day-to-day support work much smoother and much more efficient.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise76
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
From an organizational point of view, the pricing and setup costs for Microsoft Teams are right, especially since it integrates all the new technologies coming to market, including AI and various A...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
One issue is that now it requires the presenter to initiate the meeting. Previously, anyone could quickly become a presenter, but now I have to ask or request for the presentation. This can cause p...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than ten years, and it is one of the key communication tools in my organization. I use it for my personal purposes as well. For any kind of communications...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sendbird?
Compared to other chat providers, Sendbird is not that expensive to integrate and this cost is very low.
What needs improvement with Sendbird?
To improve Sendbird, it could provide features such as those in WhatsApp, including allowing users to share their current location and live location, and enabling users to keep and share their curr...
What is your primary use case for Sendbird?
My main use case for Sendbird is chat with one-to-one persons or group chat, and with other features like audio calling and video calling. For the users we have onboarded in our applications, we ha...
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
Sendbird Calls, Sendbird Desk
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Sendbird and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.