No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Teams vs TIBCO tibbr comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
181
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
TIBCO tibbr
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 6.8%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO tibbr is 2.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams6.8%
TIBCO tibbr2.4%
Other90.8%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ayush Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Collaboration has transformed daily work and supports seamless global voice communication
Microsoft Teams could be improved, especially regarding contact center solutions which have a growing need for omnichannel capabilities, integrating with external platforms such as social media and email for a unified experience. Minor improvements might include reintroducing features such as GPU options available in classic Microsoft Teams to address issues in modern Microsoft Teams related to video meetings and content sharing. Furthermore, essential information such as who started or ended recordings should be more accessible in the Microsoft Teams admin center. I rate it a nine because Microsoft Teams occasionally experiences glitches in the client, leading to missing chat history or other transient issues. The performance issues with the desktop client and the support service complexities contribute to my rating being less than perfect. I have not identified any other improvements needed for Microsoft Teams.
it_user685332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable.
The API is awful. We needed to develop a batch load tool in order to send automated events to Tibber API. The current API version is not well documented, i.e. the current version of the API in the software doesn't correspond to the web-documented API. We had to imagine parameters and names. We had difficulty making it all work, as the login/SSO mechanism was not properly explained so that we could perform external logins to the API and use their features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to share information and upload and download files on Microsoft Teams."
"The tool's integration with OneNote and Power BI is good. The current version of Microsoft Teams is significantly more user-friendly compared to previous versions. I find it easy to handle any user needs and provide assistance. The device installation process is straightforward, and configuring it for users is not complicated. This seamless and user-friendly experience makes it easy to connect with everyone."
"The instant messaging and video meeting features in Microsoft Teams improve my productivity the most. Instant messaging allows for faster responses compared to email. With many colleagues working remotely, video meetings are often the only way to connect. I could even participate in my last meeting while driving to another city. Having meetings, with some people in a meeting room and others joining remotely, is also very useful."
"I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings."
"Neither myself nor the end-users have had issues since we began using this solution."
"The planner and the breakout rooms are good and helpful features in Microsoft Teams."
"The solution has features like good voice clarity, good video quality, and recording."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are video conferencing, chat function, and the one that shows you that you've got new messages."
"The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable."
"Typically the classical ROI is about seven months from full deployment, but there are a lot of benefits that we can't measure with this metric, like more dissemination of knowledge, fast internal expert finding, less internal emails, less waste of time, and better employee engagement."
 

Cons

"The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally."
"The biggest issue is web content."
"It could be improved if it was easier to use and the interface was revamped."
"The product needs to improve its security."
"Sometimes it is quite complicated to install Microsoft Teams if we want to integrate it with SharePoint or anything else."
"Signing up for a new device for the solution is challenging."
"The application crashing in Microsoft Teams affected productivity. If we could minimize that, productivity would increase."
"They should include AI features in the solution."
"The API is awful."
"More customizable features, particularly in mobile app; better preview of document and images stored in other cloud services (like Google Drive, Dropbox and so on)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is reasonable."
"I rate the pricing as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"The solution is expensive and I would rate it a nine out of ten."
"We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution."
"It is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products."
"My understanding is that there are licensing fees, but I'm not sure how much they might be."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise76
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
From an organizational point of view, the pricing and setup costs for Microsoft Teams are right, especially since it integrates all the new technologies coming to market, including AI and various A...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
One issue is that now it requires the presenter to initiate the meeting. Previously, anyone could quickly become a presenter, but now I have to ask or request for the presentation. This can cause p...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than ten years, and it is one of the key communication tools in my organization. I use it for my personal purposes as well. For any kind of communications...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
tibbr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
InterPortPolice, Thomson Reuters, Wingstop
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. TIBCO tibbr and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.