OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. ReadyAPI Performance

Download the complete report

Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is 15.3%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Performance is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	15.3%
ReadyAPI Performance	2.5%
Other	82.2%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

HelenSague

Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway

A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications

I do not have any big challenges with LoadRunner. I only have some issues with load generators. It is a very common issue, and I hope it will be resolved in the latest release. For example, when we start to run our tests, users get the message that the load generator exceeded 80% of the CPU utilization. Even when the number of users is less, we get these messages. I am trying to resolve it, but it is not going. It is annoying. It is not a failure, but I hope that it will be resolved. IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Open-source and flexible but needs client-side scripting

It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS. Also, the APIs tested with SoapUI can be directly used, avoiding the need to create collections like in Postman. The client-side scripting, if incorporated, would provide a complete solution for performance tests. It can handle user distribution and transaction throughput distribution effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool's correlation function."

"The tool's most valuable features are scripting and automation."

"I recommend LoadRunner Professional as it supports many protocols and applications and is very easy to set up and use."

"LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful."

"It helped our organization to run successful performance testing cycles and to identify the bottlenecks of the application."

"The solution can handle a huge amount of workloads, it's quite scalable."

"One of the most valuable features of LoadRunner Professional is the wide range of protocols it supports, especially the web user v user types."

"The ability to do multithreading. That's available in any performance testing tool, but the number of protocols that this particular tool supports has been very good."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

"Eventually, we enhanced the whole automation, and how it should get integrated with the hardware, or another tool like Jenkins for CI/CD automation."

"It has helped improve productivity and functionality."

"he initial deployment process is easy."

"We can scale."

"It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs."

"It is a very good and handy product, there are so many features, and it is getting more popular day by day."

"It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS."

"ReadyAPI automation can help us validate the functionality of most web services, allowing us to find out the exact number of defects before deployment to the user interface."

Cons

"Scripting should be simpler, it becomes very complex many times."

"Sometimes, we aren't able to see an accurate page view while replying and executing the script. When you are navigating the application side by side, it needs to be displayed on a random viewer. Sometimes we will get a few applications, and we won't get others."

"The solution needs to reduce its pricing. Right now, it's quite expensive."

"Technical support is challenging. We have premier support for ALM and Performance Center, and we usually get inexperienced engineers when we contact tech support."

"I would like to see better-licensing costs."

"I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use."

"The solution lacks some form of integration."

"We have a lot of issues right now with the Citrix client, so this should be improved."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

"The solution’s interface could be improved."

"The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool."

"It is very slow sometimes."

"We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

"It is very slow sometimes. If they could improve its performance, it would be really great for the users."

"I'd not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing."

"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

"This solution could be improved by offering artificial AI testing in addition to API testing. For example, we would like to have machine learning testing because when test applications, manual work could be completed automatically using this functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you compare the cost of other tools such as NeoLoad and LoadNinja, the cost of LoadRunner is on the expensive side. As a result, we are currently considering going with NeoLoad."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and is relatively expensive."

"The price is a bit on the high side, but it is still affordable."

"The pricing model and the software licensing model could be better."

"I don't know the licensing cost, but I think that you would get a discount for normal usage. I think there are different yearly options for different types of usage. It is not only how many users, but also whether it is shareable or not and other criteria involved in each feature. There are additional fees for the users and hardware linked to the processing."

"This is not a cheap product."

"The licensing of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional could improve. If it can be easier and the concurrent run can be included with the current total number of users, it would be helpful."

"For licensing, we pay a lot for it. But the incentive is the support we get with it, that we pay once, and we are set."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

"This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."

"We find the cost to be affordable."

"ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	67

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I work only with the performance testing tools and not with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) for mobile and web applications. With performance testing, I am t...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I can provide additional advice after consulting with my team. I am open to being contacted via email for any clarifications about my review. I rate OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (L...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI Performance?

Load UI is mostly free, and the pricing for the pro version is very affordable compared to other tools like LoadRunner.

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Performance?

The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool.

What is your primary use case for ReadyAPI Performance?

The primary use case is to conduct server-side performance tests, scalability tests, and endurance tests using SoapUI and Load UI.

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Comparisons

Compared 39% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 14% of the time

k6 Open Source vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

ReadyAPI Performance

Download ReadyAPI Performance product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

LoadUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Performance is known for its powerful load, spike, and operational volume testing, supported by robust reporting and security features. It ensures easy deployment and seamless integration with platforms like Azure and AWS.

ReadyAPI Performance stands out due to its ability to handle comprehensive performance tests and measure transactions per second effectively. Its client-side scripting, coupled with impressive scalability and stability, aids in efficient defect identification and functionality validation. The tool is appreciated for supporting multiple assertions and generating detailed reports. Although users suggest enhancements like improved speed and better Apache Kafka activity monitoring, ReadyAPI Performance continues to be a trusted option for teams conducting server-side tests and evaluating web services.

What are the key features of ReadyAPI Performance?

Load and Spike Testing: Effective for evaluating site response under variable traffic conditions.
Extensive Reporting: Generates detailed performance analysis and user distribution reports.
Integration Capabilities: Bridges seamlessly with Azure, AWS, and multiple frameworks.
Client-side Scripting: Offers customization and automation for complex scenarios.
Multiple Assertions: Supports various types of assertions for thorough validation.

What are the advantages of using ReadyAPI Performance?

Scalability: Reliable under heavy loads, perfect for growing business demands.
Stability: Provides a stable environment for consistent testing outcomes.
Efficient Defect Identification: Automation boosts early bug detection.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers comprehensive features despite higher upfront costs.

Development and QA teams across industries leverage ReadyAPI Performance for fine-tuning API responses, integrating backend codes, and ensuring optimal performance in FinTech and banking services. By configuring automation for scalability and endurance tests, they validate transaction efficacy and backend integrations, especially with open banking services.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. ReadyAPI Performance