No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo

Top 10 OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
4.0 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, WhatsUp Gold, and Microsoft Configuration Manager. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management attracts those seeking lower setup costs and reliable support. In comparison, Microsoft Intune appeals to organizations valuing integration with Microsoft 365 and advanced cloud capabilities, despite initial setup expenses, promising extensive long-term benefits for comprehensive suite integration.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management initially incurs higher setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more affordable startup option. The pricing disparity highlights distinct cost preferences between these management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management initially incurs higher setup costs, while Microsoft Intune offers a more affordable startup option. The pricing disparity highlights distinct cost preferences between these management solutions.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Organizations use WhatsUp Gold for network and application performance monitoring, tracking server resources and virtual machines. Featuring flow monitoring and customized topology mapping, it supports proactive monitoring and efficient network management. Challenges include its user interface and limited integration. Pricing and licensing need adjustments, prompting some to seek alternatives.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers robust Microsoft tool integration and automated patch management. In comparison, OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management excels with unified endpoint and cross-platform support. Buyers favor Microsoft for cost-effectiveness, while OpenText appeals to diverse IT environments with hybrid capabilities.
Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher initial setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher initial setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides a more budget-friendly setup option.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and comprehensive endpoint management. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform attracts tech buyers seeking advanced features, scalability, and a robust open-source community despite a higher cost.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a more complex setup cost while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a simpler pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a more complex setup cost while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a simpler pricing model.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers robust endpoint management and cost-effective asset management. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation excels in advanced orchestration and integration with VMware's ecosystem. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides straightforward deployment, whereas VMware Aria Automation features extensive automation capabilities but requires a steeper learning curve.

Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to VMware Aria Automation, with the latter offering a more budget-friendly solution for businesses looking to minimize setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to VMware Aria Automation, with the latter offering a more budget-friendly solution for businesses looking to minimize setup expenses.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Both BigFix and OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offer diverse endpoint management features appealing to different organizational needs. BigFix excels in real-time security and advanced remediation. In comparison, OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management enhances productivity with policy-driven management and seamless integration.
Download BigFix vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
BigFix offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management, highlighting a key pricing difference.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management, highlighting a key pricing difference.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management excels in asset and patch management capabilities, making it ideal for organizations seeking robust management features. In comparison, HashiCorp Terraform offers an unparalleled infrastructure automation and scalability, appealing to buyers prioritizing flexible, cost-effective solutions with strong community support.
Download HashiCorp Terraform vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management incurs higher setup costs compared to HashiCorp Terraform, which offers more cost-effective pricing for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management incurs higher setup costs compared to HashiCorp Terraform, which offers more cost-effective pricing for initial setup.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks excels in desktop management and asset tracking, ideal for comprehensive IT management focus. In comparison, CloudBees supports continuous integration and delivery, perfect for enhancing agile development. OpenText's pricing aids budget-conscious enterprises, while CloudBees justifies higher costs through productivity gains.
Download CloudBees vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers competitive setup costs, while CloudBees tends to have higher initial expenses. The pricing difference highlights ZENworks' affordability in contrast to CloudBees' premium setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers competitive setup costs, while CloudBees tends to have higher initial expenses. The pricing difference highlights ZENworks' affordability in contrast to CloudBees' premium setup investment.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides scalable asset management and effective endpoint security integrations, ideal for cost-sensitive buyers. In comparison, Red Hat Satellite offers robust lifecycle management and extensive system support, making it valuable for those seeking advanced features despite a higher cost.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Red Hat Satellite Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a moderate setup cost, whereas Red Hat Satellite's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features. Red Hat Satellite is more expensive, but it offers more comprehensive management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a moderate setup cost, whereas Red Hat Satellite's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features. Red Hat Satellite is more expensive, but it offers more comprehensive management capabilities.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Chef
3.9 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Chef
3.9 out of 5
Chef offers flexibility and scalability, whereas OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management excels in enterprise-friendly features. Chef's cost-effectiveness and quick deployment appeal to businesses seeking efficient automation. In comparison, OpenText ZENworks provides advanced security and compliance, offering extensive support despite a higher price.
Download Chef vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
Chef has a straightforward and predictable setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is noted for its high initial setup cost. Chef provides an economical option, contrasting with the more costly setup of OpenText ZENworks.
View comparison
Pricing
Chef has a straightforward and predictable setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is noted for its high initial setup cost. Chef provides an economical option, contrasting with the more costly setup of OpenText ZENworks.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is often chosen for its comprehensive endpoint management, automated patches, and cost-effective pricing models. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager is preferred for centralized operational data, cloud integration, and ease of deployment, appealing particularly to those seeking advanced features and capabilities.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs compared to AWS Systems Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs compared to AWS Systems Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management appeals to those needing integrated endpoint and policy management. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation attracts users requiring extensive cloud management and automation. OpenText's predictable setup costs contrast with AWS's potential for high ROI through resource optimization.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management involves lower setup costs compared to AWS CloudFormation, which includes more intricate initial pricing. AWS's complexity contrasts with the straightforward setup of OpenText, highlighting substantial differences in approach.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management involves lower setup costs compared to AWS CloudFormation, which includes more intricate initial pricing. AWS's complexity contrasts with the straightforward setup of OpenText, highlighting substantial differences in approach.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Perforce Puppet
4.1 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Perforce Puppet
4.1 out of 5
Perforce Puppet attracts budget-conscious tech buyers with its automation capabilities and favorable pricing. In comparison, OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers advanced asset and endpoint management, appealing to those who prioritize secure workflows and quick ROI through comprehensive feature sets.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Perforce Puppet Report
Perforce Puppet's setup cost is generally higher compared to OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Perforce Puppet's setup cost is generally higher compared to OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
BMC TrueSight Server Automation
4.2 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is preferred for its pricing, simple deployment, and effective customer service. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Server Automation excels with scalable automation and comprehensive features. OpenText offers better affordability and support, while BMC TrueSight provides advanced features and perceived higher ROI.
Download BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
The setup cost for OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is comparatively lower, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is comparatively lower, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation has a higher initial investment.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks
3.8 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers cost-effective endpoint management with simpler deployment and strong support. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks delivers advanced network automation with higher initial investment, focusing on thorough configuration and compliance for enhanced efficiency.
Download BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically has a more straightforward setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks often involves a more complex initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management typically has a more straightforward setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks often involves a more complex initial setup.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
SUSE Manager
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
SUSE Manager
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has more competitive pricing and customer support, while SUSE Manager leads with comprehensive features. Users praise OpenText ZENworks for straightforward management and scalability but suggest better reporting tools. SUSE Manager offers advanced capabilities, needing improved documentation and a streamlined update process.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. SUSE Manager Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a straightforward setup cost, while SUSE Manager offers a more complex installation process. Effective product selection depends on balancing initial investment against deployment complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has a straightforward setup cost, while SUSE Manager offers a more complex installation process. Effective product selection depends on balancing initial investment against deployment complexity.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
vCenter Configuration Manager
4.3 out of 5
vCenter Configuration Manager offers integration with other VMware products and comprehensive reporting. In comparison, OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides automated device management and patching. vCenter requires a more intuitive setup, while OpenText needs better scalability. Pricing favors vCenter initially, yet OpenText delivers superior long-term ROI.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. vCenter Configuration Manager Report
vCenter Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers more affordable initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
vCenter Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers more affordable initial pricing.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers centralized management and affordability. In comparison, Spring Cloud excels in cloud integration and microservices support. OpenText's deployment is straightforward with reliable support, while Spring Cloud requires technical expertise but provides long-term value. Spring Cloud's extensive features contrast with OpenText's cost-effectiveness.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. Spring Cloud Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs, while Spring Cloud offers a more affordable initial setup, making cost a significant factor when comparing the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs, while Spring Cloud offers a more affordable initial setup, making cost a significant factor when comparing the two solutions.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management excels in centralized asset management and endpoint management. In comparison, AWS Config offers deeper resource monitoring and compliance auditing, aligning with cloud management. A tech buyer may choose ZENworks for traditional setups, while AWS Config suits cloud-first strategies.
Download AWS Config vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management users report moderate setup costs, while AWS Config users indicate lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management users report moderate setup costs, while AWS Config users indicate lower initial setup expenses.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
ManageEngine OS Deployer
3.0 out of 5

ManageEngine OS Deployer is used for efficient OS imaging and deployment. It provides valuable features like centralized management and ease of use. Users note room for improvement in hardware support and reporting capabilities, enhancing its adaptability to various environments.

View comparison
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
SolarWinds Server Configuration Monitor
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers strong support and competitive pricing, while SolarWinds Server Configuration Monitor provides superior features like real-time change detection and compliance tracking. In comparison, SolarWinds's comprehensive capabilities make it a valuable investment, whereas OpenText ZENworks is noted for its affordability and asset management.
Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management vs. SolarWinds Server Configuration Monitor Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server Configuration Monitor is more cost-effective to implement. Additionally, SolarWinds offers a simpler installation process compared to OpenText's more complex setup procedure.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server Configuration Monitor is more cost-effective to implement. Additionally, SolarWinds offers a simpler installation process compared to OpenText's more complex setup procedure.
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Logo
KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA)
4.3 out of 5
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management offers integrated management and security features suited for detailed asset oversight and support. In comparison, KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA) is ideal for its efficient deployment tools and simplicity, appealing to organizations emphasizing large-scale systems deployment ease.
Download KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA) vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Report
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management reviews indicate a significant setup cost difference, while KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA) shows lower initial costs, highlighting a key factor influencing user decisions between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management reviews indicate a significant setup cost difference, while KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA) shows lower initial costs, highlighting a key factor influencing user decisions between these solutions.

Related categories

Configuration Management
Remote Access
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)