The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security.
I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools.
The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security.
I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools.
Veracode is a cloud-based application security platform that enables organizations to detect, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities throughout the software development lifecycle while supporting scalability and integration with DevOps workflows.
Its complexity makes it quite expensive, but it’s all worth it, with all the engineering in the background.
The pricing is pretty high.
Its complexity makes it quite expensive, but it’s all worth it, with all the engineering in the background.
The pricing is pretty high.
This is a value for money product.
The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.
This is a value for money product.
The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.
We are paying a lot of money to use WhiteSource. In our company, it is not easy to argue that it is worth the price.
The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps.
We are paying a lot of money to use WhiteSource. In our company, it is not easy to argue that it is worth the price.
The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps.
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost.
With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level.
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost.
With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level.
The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth.
The solution is expensive.
The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth.
The solution is expensive.
The solution is expensive.
The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten.
The solution is expensive.
The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten.
Check with your account manager.
Nothing special. It's a very fair model.
Check with your account manager.
Nothing special. It's a very fair model.
The pricing is okay.
It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc.
The pricing is okay.
It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc.
