IBM Security Verify Access vs Symantec VIP Access Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Access Management category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #31. IBM holds a 3.3% mindshare in AM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

4,833 Views
2,465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec VIP Access Manager

Read 15 Symantec VIP Access Manager reviews

3,951 Views
1,106 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Symantec VIP Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec VIP Access Manager and IBM Security Verify Access compete in the identity and access management market. IBM Security Verify Access has the upper hand with its comprehensive features, versatile security protocols, and advanced capabilities.

Features: Symantec VIP Access Manager offers robust multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with various applications, and strong security protocols. IBM Security Verify Access provides extensive policy management, adaptive access controls, and superior customization options.

Room for Improvement: Symantec VIP Access Manager needs to enhance its scalability, consistency in user experience, and overall platform performance. IBM Security Verify Access could benefit from better documentation, a simpler configuration process, and improved user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec VIP Access Manager is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. IBM Security Verify Access involves a more complex setup but offers exceptional customer support, making up for initial deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec VIP Access Manager is reviewed positively for its reasonable setup costs and quick ROI. IBM Security Verify Access, while more expensive, justifies the cost with its advanced features and significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Access Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (13th), Identity Management (IM) (19th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (15th)

Symantec VIP Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 3.3%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec VIP Access Manager is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Security Verify Access	3.3%
Symantec VIP Access Manager	1.7%
Other	95.0%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Berk Onur

Presales Consultant at Cyberwise

With its mobile application, this tool offers a convenient and user-friendly experience to its users

To improve the tool, I think that the solution should consider integrations with other cybersecurity and IT technologies, such as Privileged Access Management and Site Integration. Additionally, the implementation of second-factor authentication via Symantec VIP Access Manager, CyberArk, and Delinea, among other technologies, could be best for the product. While the existing technology is okay, improving the integration capabilities for Symantec VIP Access Manager would benefit the product. I would like to see the solution meet the integration needs at our company. While many cybersecurity solutions can function independently, they often lack integration with our systems due to missed integration points. Improving the solution's integration feature would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth; for legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users, and from the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"It can do a lot of different functions, and different types of teams can use this product for a variety of use cases, such as RSA, OTP, and single sign-on functionalities."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

"Other than it provides us with remote access, so it's fairly easy to install, fairly easy to set up, and provides us the ability to get into our corporate environment."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity by approximately a minute."

"The main benefit of Symantec VIP is that it provides strong authentication while keeping it as a very user friendly experience."

"Integration with Citrix Access Gateway, Microsoft Office 365 and Single Sign-On (through Symantec Validation and ID Protection Access Manager) has increased the productivity of the employees for accessing resources."

"The tool has been very stable, in my experience. Also, I haven't faced any issues or problems with integration or connectivity."

"Cloud-based service and management."

"The ease of integrating into an existing authentication system."

"In this version 9.1, lots of changes are done for the dashboard, User Store etc."

More Symantec VIP Access Manager pros

Cons

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

"The User Store synchronization part needs to improve. Also, the logs, reports, and dashboard can be improved."

"If they had dashboards or a report for managers or executives, then it would allow them to see the status and have it make sense to them."

"It is challenging to use when installing a new version."

"Technical support is one of the worst problems."

"Geofencing needs improvement."

"The gateway server is a RADIUS server, but it lacks the functionality of returning RADIUS attributes other than those that are required for the gateway to authenticate the users."

"Our only issue was with user training. The additional challenge was not well received."

"Every time that I have a new phone or computer, it takes a little longer to deploy it."

More Symantec VIP Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"There is a one-time setup fee plus the licenses are provided as per the number of users. For SMS and voice calls, the costs are separate."

"There are additional costs for maintenance."

"I can say that the solution is worth the money."

"Licensing and pricing seems very fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 6% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Identity Manager by One Identity vs Symantec VIP Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Okta Platform vs Symantec VIP Access Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec VIP Access Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Symantec VIP Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Symantec VIP Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec VIP Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access

October 2026

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec VIP Access Manager

September 2026

Download Symantec VIP Access Manager product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Symantec VIP

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access offers adaptable access management with multi-factor authentication, seamless protocol integration, and strong user management, suitable for cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Security Verify Access provides multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with protocols like SAML and OAuth, and features including password vaults and single sign-on. Its adaptable nature allows for deployment both in cloud and on-premises settings. Users appreciate its quick setup, reliable authorization, and efficient user management, especially when integrated with Active Directory. The intuitive interface enhances security with mobile features like QR code enrollment, making it suitable for diverse environments. However, cloud deployment could be simpler, and the interface could use enhancements for better ease. Onboarding applications and support availability need improvements, and configuration for OIDC and OAuth should mature. More comprehensive documentation and simplified installation are also needed, along with automation to reduce resource consumption.

What are the key features of IBM Security Verify Access?

Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust multi-layered security.
Integration with Protocols: Works with SAML and OAuth for seamless connectivity.
Password Vaults: Secure storage for user credentials.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across platforms.
Active Directory Integration: Ensures efficient user management.
Mobile Features: Includes QR code enrollment for enhanced security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect to find in the reviews?

Rapid Setup: Quick deployment in cloud and on-premises environments.
Reliable Authorization: Trustworthy access control and management.
Security Enhancements: Through multi-factor authentication and mobile features.
Streamlined Processes: Simplified access management with single sign-on.

IBM Security Verify Access is widely used in the banking and educational sectors for access management, supporting activities like single sign-on and control across different user groups. Many in these industries utilize it for customer authentication and integrate it with mobile systems to enhance security. Its adaptability allows it to serve complex needs, particularly useful in environments such as universities and financial institutions.

IBM

Symantec VIP Access Manager offers seamless integration with applications, providing robust user authentication and enhanced security for remote work. Its cloud-based design ensures consistent connectivity and is convenient for users.

Designed for strengthening access security, Symantec VIP Access Manager features strong user authentication and easy application integration. Its fast interface and reliable VPN access support risk-based authentication. Users can securely work remotely, leveraging a mobile app for generating digital codes, crucial for multifactor authentication. The cloud-based solution ensures access even when company VPNs are down, reducing hardware costs with Mobile Credential and offering enhanced dashboards in version 9.1.

What are the standout features of Symantec VIP Access Manager?

Strong Authentication: Provides robust multifactor authentication enhancing security.
Application Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing applications.
Mobile Utility: Allows secure work through mobile devices for remote access.
Cloud Connectivity: Ensures access even if company VPNs experience issues.
Enhanced Dashboards: Version 9.1 introduces advanced dashboard features.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Reduced Hardware Costs: Mobile Credential lowers expenses by lessening hardware dependencies.
Secure Remote Work: Facilitates safe access to networks and emails while working remotely.
Reliability: Provides consistent access through cloud services.
Enhanced Security: Risk-based authentication strengthens data protection.

Symantec VIP Access Manager is commonly used in industries requiring secure remote connectivity. Organizations implement it to generate login codes for multifactor authentication, critical for employees accessing networks via VPN tools like Palo Alto GlobalProtect and Fortinet VPN. It supports secure remote workflows, vital in sectors prioritizing data protection and remote access.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

Maine Medical Center, Aria S.p.A

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager

September 2026

Free Report: IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.