N-able Cove Data Protection vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

N-able and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N-able is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #49. N-able holds a 1.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

N-able Cove Data Protection

Read 24 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews

9,486 Views
5,502 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

7,980 Views
7,342 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

N-able Cove Data Protection

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and N-able Cove Data Protection are two popular data protection solutions. N-able Cove Data Protection seems to be a superior product due to its features, and users feel it is worth the price.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers robust backup and recovery options and integrates well with various platforms. Users appreciate its scalability and detailed reporting capabilities. N-able Cove Data Protection features cloud-first architecture, seamless integration with RMM tools, and automated backup verification. Users value its simplicity and reliability. N-able Cove Data Protection stands out for its enhanced cloud capabilities and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Users of OpenText Data Protector point out the need for a more intuitive setup process and improved technical support documentation. They also mention the desire for faster backups. N-able Cove Data Protection users suggest enhancements in reporting features and better pricing transparency. They also highlight the need for more granular control over backup schedules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is often mentioned as requiring a complex deployment process and users report mixed experiences with customer service. N-able Cove Data Protection receives praise for its straightforward cloud deployment model and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is noted for its competitive pricing and solid return on investment, although some users find the initial setup costs a bit high. N-able Cove Data Protection users report satisfaction with the cost-effectiveness and express positive ROI experiences, citing its feature set justifies the expense.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able Cove Data Protection

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (19th), SaaS Backup (10th), MSP Backup (2nd)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

49th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able Cove Data Protection	1.5%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	97.5%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Grace Myna

HR Consultant

Secure reminders have improved HR document control and support better client deadline management

I really love the reminders feature of N-able Cove Data Protection because I have many dates to keep in mind while working with multiple clients. The access settings are important for me too, and the fact that HR documents are personal means I do not want everyone seeing everything, especially because in HR we talk mostly about confidentiality. It is important that not everyone gets to see everything unless they have access, and I also appreciate being able to tell which copy is the final one. The reminders feature stands out for me the most because I deal with many dates and deadlines. The reminders work well for me in practice because they make it easy for me; I do not have to keep checking my calendar, even though I also use other calendars such as Calendly. The reminders come in handy because I do not have to keep going back to that, helping me ensure that I meet deadlines and do not miss client meetings, making it easier for me to stay organized.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"N-Able, as a whole, has given me the RMM solution that I desire and the backup solutions that I desire."

"I know I won't have an issue if the data is there. The reliability and the confidence that we have is amazing. It doesn't matter. We've had customers have ransomware. We've had customers that have had corruption. We've had customers that have had employees destroy their data. As long as it's been backed up, I know that I can get it back and I know I have nothing to worry about. Our confidence level is very high."

"The ease of use and the console are great."

"The user interface is the most valuable. It gives us the ability to check everything. With more than 100 endpoints running that software, I like the ability to quickly check that everything is working correctly. That's one of the biggest selling points."

"The most valuables feature is the alerts and monitoring that catches the failed backups."

"We've got twenty-seven different clients right now using Cove and our success rate on backups, taking out all the variables like computers being offline or crashing, is about a 95% to 99% success rate at all times."

"Cove Data Protection has given us a fresh start in data backups."

"For us, this product works well."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pros

"It works excellently only with Oracle."

"It's very easy to use."

"The ability to run multiple jobs to multiple devices and systems is the best part of this system."

"Since HP Data Protector has the capability to do seamless integration with each of the OS's and hypervisors, this makes it a complete solution for my environment."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"A feature I'd like to see would be a more customizable admin console."

"One area I don't like has to do with the agent that goes on the system. Deploying it is a piece of cake, but something I have noticed is that if a system stays offline for some length of time, say for a week or so, I may have to go back in and reinstall the agent to get it back in business."

"I have some issues with the agent failing on workstations. I've had to completely uninstall several of them, delete everything, and start over to get them to work."

"The only reason I wouldn't give them a ten out of ten is we aren't able to restore in the cloud and test everything out as we can on Datto, without having to download the full image onto bare metal hardware."

"We would like to have better reporting."

"Integration with a hybrid cloud is something that I found complicated."

"The recovery side, the restore side, could be a little more optimized."

"This solution is not very good for image restores, mainly just files. The solution also does not allow you to enable or disable backups. Sometimes, our users will connect via mobile device and it will use their data to perform the backup. If they were able to enable and disable the backup, they would not have this issue."

More N-able Cove Data Protection cons

"They could really improve on the integrity. A lot of times I get the log error or no log message."

"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."

"Hyper-V backups need improvement so they can do GRE."

"With scalability, there are a few limitations. It's limited to certain platforms."

"I am not happy with the support structure within HPE when things go wrong."

"I think their support is OK, but not very good."

"Faster VEAgent Restores"

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."

"When you have a device/appliance on the site quite a lot of the other enterprise class backup people insist that you have their appliance, which is frankly offensively expensive. Because when you pry the top off, it's just a standard 19-inch tin box with a standard Intel I5 in it, some RAM, and a hard drive. Then, you go, "Why have they just charged me 5,500 quid for a box, which I could have probably build for under 500." Whereas, with the SolarWinds product, they don't have that. The backup appliances that we have onsite are just plain cooking PCs. We can build our own machines, which is reflected in the price that we can offer a customer."

"The pricing is very competitive and it's well worth the price."

"The pricing, for now, is good. The package that they gave us recently is pretty good. It depends on how many clients you have, and you pay for certain terabytes per license. These terabytes, if not used, are pooled together."

"The pricing is affordable. N-able Cove Data Protection has a direct-to-cloud architecture, but it also allows saving backups locally without extra storage costs."

"N-able Cove Data Protection is an averagely-priced product."

"The cost is around ten dollars per workstation a month and that includes a certain amount of data."

"Cove only takes the data you have on the physical server. I can back that up for long periods of time, and I don't accrue high charges to have the data in the cloud. It stays at one rate. This allows me to forecast payment for the next one or two years and show clients their estimated growth."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?

We have not needed interns for a long time. For the one year, we did not need an intern because initially, we wanted interns because sometimes our team would be overwhelmed.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Backup?

For now, I do not have anything else to add about the features apart from the confidentiality aspect; it helps me ensure that HR documents are personal, so someone who does not have access to them ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able Backup?

My main use case for N-able Cove Data Protection is to rely on it mostly for HR related documents, and I have been using it for quite some time. I normally open it when I need to check signed docum...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

ConnectWise BCDR vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 2% of the time

More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection

October 2026

Download N-able Cove Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

N-able Cove Data Protection delivers cloud-based data backup and disaster recovery with features like ease of use, automation, and efficient data transfer. Its unified dashboard and virtual disaster recovery options are key highlights for simplifying data management.

N-able Cove Data Protection stands out for its comprehensive cloud-based architecture, offering reliable backup, disaster recovery, and archiving solutions across industries such as legal, healthcare, and finance. Users benefit from features like virtual disaster recovery, bare-metal restore, and efficient data transfer. Cove's straightforward setup and resource efficiency make it popular among managed service providers, as it supports diverse environments, including Windows, Linux, and macOS systems. Despite its strengths, users have noted areas for improvement, such as dashboard navigation, cloud integration, and prolonged initial backup times.

What are the key features of N-able Cove Data Protection?

Ease of Use: Simplified setup and management with an intuitive interface.
Automation: Streamlined processes for efficient data handling.
Cloud-Based Architecture: Reliable backup and recovery from any location.
Virtual Disaster Recovery: Enables swift data restoration scenarios.
Bare-Metal Restore: Facilitates complete system recovery from hardware failures.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating data protection?

Resource Efficiency: Optimizes system resources to minimize overhead.
Remote Access: Simplifies data management with a unified dashboard from any location.
Scalability: Suits diverse organizational sizes and needs.
Integration: Supports Windows, Linux, macOS, and virtual environments.

Industries like legal, healthcare, and finance utilize N-able Cove Data Protection for its robust server, workstation, and Office 365 data backup capabilities. With support for SQL, MySQL, Exchange, and file backups, Cove aids managed service providers in efficiently managing both local and remote environments, offering strong disaster recovery, testing, and item-level restoration options.

N-able

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Free Report: N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able Cove Data Protection vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.